Hitler responds to the iPad

 

– and he’s not impressed.

Personally, I’m waiting until the MS launches the “Courier” before I make another tablet purchase.

This entry was posted by stageleft on Friday, January 29th, 2010 and is filed under Humour, Internet & Technology. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Recommend this Post @ Progressive Bloggers

8 Responses to “Hitler responds to the iPad”

  1. Boris on January 29th, 2010 at 11:33 am

    More or less agreed. No one I’ve spoken to can figure out the point of the iPad much beyond being an big iPhone mixed with a Kindle. They are coming out i iWork software for it, which might make it useful for working while travelling, but…word processing and spreadsheets on a small touch screen?

    Hmm, could they have scaled down a Macbook Air plonked a touch screen on top?

  2. Ti-Guy on January 29th, 2010 at 11:58 am

    I can wait. I’m not going to carry more than one device around. I resisted a cellphone for the longest time until the IPhone came out and I could stop carrying my laptop around, all the time, ‘just in case’. The electronic reader-type devices that have come out so far just add to the count.

  3. stageleft on January 29th, 2010 at 12:04 pm

    I have a Blackberry and an ASUS R2H tablet so there is no real impetus to even think about getting an iPad (besides, as Hitler said, it doesn’t even have a manly name) – I will however consider the MS Courier when it comes out because it looks like it might be useful.

  4. BJ on January 29th, 2010 at 12:39 pm

    word processing and spreadsheets on a small touch screen?

    You can plug it into a full-size keyboard, or use a bluetooth-enabled one, which makes it a lot more attractive for that purpose. In truth, it will probably be in the accessories where this iPad really starts taking off as being actually useful. Even as is, however, I can see some real potential, particularly given the rumour that they’ll be making college textbooks available on them so students won’t have to lug around 40 or 50 lbs of thick hardcovers to class every day. And the iPad looks like it will be a lot easier to deal with than a laptop on a plane when the person in front leans their seat back.

    Still, even as a bonafide Mac-head, I won’t be rushing out to grab one of these. My biggest beef is the lack of any USB ports for the connection of some of the Macbook Air -type accessories like an external disk drive and ethernet connector. Without those, I still need to lug about my laptop anyway, so why bother with an additional toy?

    My suspicion is that as with the iPod and iPhone, it’ll only be the second or third iteration of the design that will see the device move into the “buy” category.

  5. stageleft on January 29th, 2010 at 12:55 pm

    I can’t imagine owning any device that can’t perform simple multitasking – WTF was Apple thinking when they decided that would be a good idea? Even my Blackberry can (and usually does) run multiple apps at the same time so that older technology is still ahead of the iPad in the categories titled “useful” and “productive”.

  6. Ti-Guy on January 29th, 2010 at 2:15 pm

    I can’t imagine a device that can’t have several applications on the go at the same time either, although I don’t multi-task and never have, because such a thing doesn’t in fact exist. Some research has emerged recently to suggest that people who have several disparate tasks on the go at the same time (as opposed to tasks that compliment each other) are less efficient that those who just work on one thing, complete it and then move to another.

  7. Fat Arse on January 29th, 2010 at 3:03 pm

    @Ti-Guy – I resent your implication that those of us who multitask are unable to focussssss … err, … ooooh, oh my, new shinny thing just appeared in my other open window… (tick, tick, tick, minutes pass) … ahem, what was I saying again?

  8. Ti-Guy on January 29th, 2010 at 3:41 pm

    You were lamenting the fact that you lost your wallet this morning and that I coincidentally, have one exactly like it. Anyway, what a shame. Why do bad things happen to good people?!! ;)

    Anyway, it’s not always that simple. The ability to shift focus is dependant on age and brain biology. Some people are biologically better at it and the cognitive speed of the brain diminishes with age. Some tasks don’t require much intense focus before they can be handled with fleeting attention while others require sustained focus.

    From what I’ve seen of its impact on memory and tacit/explicit knowledge, however, I don’t credit multi-tasking with all that much. One of the things I’ve noticed quite a bit in the last few years is the phenomenon of people getting away with making outrageous assertions in news interviews because no one remembers anything factual. It also might go a long way to explain why there seems to be so many people these days who are either entirely too credulous or entirely too suspicious. I’m not sure if that’s related necessarily to multi-tasking or information access, but the fact that a lot people don’t know anything until they look it up doesn’t bode well, I think.

Causes & Sponsors

Recent Comments

  • southern quebec: I don’t understand the point. Some buffoon from BC keeps sending me one. I am in a BQ riding....
  • Lee Harding: This is why the Canadian Taxpayers Federation invited its supporters to stop ten percenters:...
  • ck: Oh my! Why am I not surprised?
  • stageleft: Apparently free thinkers are bad as well [ source ]
  • Skinny Dipper: I read the Communist Manifesto in my first year Political Science course at the University of Western...
  • Ti-Guy: I’m skeptical that it is as bad as ‘Metro’ made it sound, although it sounds pretty bad. It’s...
  • Dr.Dawg: I know, cheap shot, but shouldn’t that be “Thinner Mike Duffy?”
  • Looney Canuck: Someone pointed it out to me this morning on the bus. I’m skeptical that it is as bad as...
  • Throbbin: I don’t like critical thinking. Gums up the brain.
  • Ti-Guy: “Kim Kierans, head of the King’s School of Journalism, was surprised to hear Duffy’s comments. She...

Recent Trackbacks


Disclaimer: The writings, musing, comments, thoughts, and ideas, put forward within the stageleft.info domain belong solely to their individual authors who hold ultimate responsibility for them. While here be mindful of the words of Buddha: Believe nothing just because a so-called wise person said it. Believe nothing just because a belief is generally held. Believe nothing just because it is said in ancient books. Believe nothing just because it is said to be of divine origin. Believe nothing just because someone else believes it. Believe only what you yourself test and judge to be true.

Designed by Gabfire slightly modified by stageleft