Shorter Stephen Harper

 

I’m gonna do something about infant mortality rates in developing countries and get into the newspapers – don’t look too closely at my back yard, there’s really nothing to see there.

OK, so it’s not really a “shorter” post – read the rest anyway.

With plight of mothers, Harper seeks new G8 course

…….the Prime Minister is hoping maternal and child health will become Canada’s “signature” focus at the G8 meeting, underlining his government’s hope the group can find a lasting raison-d’être.

“Members of the G8 can make a tangible difference in maternal and child health and Canada will be making this the top priority in June,” Mr. Harper said in a statement. “Far too many lives and unexplored futures have already been lost for want of relatively simple health caresolutions.”

Golly Mr. Harper, what a noble, selfless, caring, leader of one of the wealthiest countries in the world, you are.

Inuit infant mortality three times Canadian average; children go hungry: Study

Inuit infants die at well over three times the rate of other Canadian babies, according to a massive new study published Monday in the Canadian Medical Association Journal.

And as if to underscore the tough situation facing aboriginal children in Canada’s North, a second study in the same journal found that 70 per cent of Inuit preschoolers live in homes where there isn’t always enough food.

“Inuit children in Nunavut are faced with health challenges that are more severe than those in Southern Canada due to the socio-economic conditions facing the entire territory,” said Dr. Isaac Sobol, the territory’s chief public officer of health.

To study the Inuit infant mortality rate, University of Montreal researcher Dr. Zhong-Cheng Luo looked at all four million births in Canada between 1990 and 2000. He then broke out those that occurred in 53 predominantly Inuit communities in the Arctic, from Labrador in the east the Mackenzie Delta in the west.
After comparing those births with deaths in the first year of life, Luo found the mortality rate for Inuit infants was 16.5 per thousand live births – a rate not seen in Southern Canada since 1971 and 3.6 times the Canadian average of 4.6 deaths.

Places like Sri Lanka, Estonia, The West Bank, and a few other countries I’d never heard of before, may be doing better than Canadian Inuit are but don’t you worry about that (gods know your various predecessors didn’t so why should you ‘eh?), you just toddle off to Europe and announce grand plans on big stages because that’s where the headlines are and, as we know, that’s the really important part of governing and getting re-elected.

Besides….. Inuit mortality rates have been comparable to those of third world countries for a long time now, it’s not really news, Canadians have never cared before, so why should they care now?

This entry was posted by stageleft on Wednesday, January 27th, 2010 and is filed under Aboriginal Issues, Canada. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Recommend this Post @ Progressive Bloggers

11 Responses to “Shorter Stephen Harper”

  1. Chrystal Ocean on January 27th, 2010 at 8:07 pm

    Good one. The original link in your tweet didn’t work, so I’ve sent another tweet.

  2. sooey on January 28th, 2010 at 7:35 am

    On the bright side, now that he’s done ruining Canada, maybe he wants to move on to the UN.

  3. stageleft on January 28th, 2010 at 7:51 am

    No sooey, there is no bright side to this, not even a sarcastic one. Canadian infants are dying in the Arctic at rates three times that of other Canadians and Harper has decided he should focus on infant mortality rates in developing countries…. maybe he (and the rest of Canada) should spend a bit more time looking in our own back yard.

    Why the child poverty/hunger and infant mortality rates in the north are not causing Canadian heads to duck red faced in shame everytime the media or some government blowhard at a carefully staged photo-op brings up conditions in the third world escapes me completely.

    Maybe someone can take a few minutes and explain to us all why is it so easy for Canadians to ignore those things at home while being so sympathetic to the plight of others?

  4. uberVU - social comments on January 28th, 2010 at 8:57 am

    Social comments and analytics for this post…

    This post was mentioned on Twitter by stageleft: Shorter @pmharper: Forget #Canada, I’m gonna fix other countries http://digg.com/u1LWYz #Inuit #canpoli #cdnpoli #inuit #infantmortality…

  5. JimBobby on January 28th, 2010 at 9:39 am

    Here’s some more damning news:

    The infant mortality rate across Canadian First Nations reserves is up to seven times higher than among the general population, according to a report released Wednesday from UNICEF Canada.

    And between 2002 and 2006, the tuberculosis rate among the Inuit was 90 times higher than in the non-Aboriginal population in Canada, the study said.
    Source: Vancouver Sun

    Maybe the foreign press covering Harper’s Davos speech can be made aware of the situation here in our home and native land.

  6. Shiner on January 28th, 2010 at 9:54 am

    It’s a strike against the Liberals. Ignatieff has been beating the women and children drum in regards to international aid for the past couple months. I think it was shaping up to be the core of the Liberal foreign aid policy.

  7. balbulican on January 28th, 2010 at 10:22 am

    a) You get points for talking up aid and compassion on the international stage. You don’t get points for doing it domestically – too many embarassments, as you’ve illustrated.

    b) Most Aboriginal votes go liberal (Nunavut was a big shock last time, but the Cons probably have it for as long as they want now), so there’s very little political advantage to doing stuff for those ridings .

    c) The assimilationist thrust of Conservative policy requires a shift of resources from reserves to cities – see the CMHC funding allocations for public housing.

    d) Similarly, the assault on the nation to nation basis of relationships between government and FNs requires that responsibility be shifted to the provinces in areas like education and health – with resources transferred to the province for their pains, of course.

  8. Peter on January 28th, 2010 at 10:54 am

    In addition to what balb said, there is a natural human tendency to reduce such issues to ones of baseline moral clarity in proportion to one’s distance, both physical and psychological, from them. Sometimes that “clarity” is simplistic and hypocritical, sometimes it allows a view of the forest unobstructed by trees. Put another way, most people tend to be both more morally ambiguous and scummier at close quarters.

    Distance from government and the general public has usually favoured aboriginal peoples, which explains not only the historical preference for dealing with the feds over the provinces (and certainly over local municipalities), but also their traditional perception of a direct relationaship with the Crown.

  9. debra on January 28th, 2010 at 1:39 pm

    Harpers concerns for the developing worlds women and children came on the heels of the announcement of the charitable organizations “Right to Play” being introduced into the northern reserves??? An organization usually found in third world countries. Only In Canada you say…pity.

  10. JimBobby on January 28th, 2010 at 1:54 pm

    @debra – Pro-Democracy demonstrations and marches used to be only found in third world hell holes, too.

  11. Stageleft: life on the left side » Let Them Eat Eskimo Pie! on January 31st, 2010 at 1:57 pm

    [...] Point, soaring at 35,000 feet over You missed the point, Charles. It was already ably explored by my steamed colleague Stageleft, but let me see if I can [...]

Causes & Sponsors

Recent Comments

  • Canuckguy: So what? No doubt some so-called Canadians have to be watched. Just because they are Canadian does not...
  • Ti-Guy: The abuse of the privilege really was on the part of the Conservatives with those one-page flyers bulk-mailed...
  • Candace: I got on Jack!s mailing list years ago. I just laugh and toss them into the recycling bin without opening...
  • Obedient: I’m not sure whether to like critical thinking or not…maybe I should ask an authority figure?
  • balbulican: No, thank YOU for the link and the green beer and fireworks.
  • JJ: He/she/it has forsaken facebook for twitter, and is now known as @god.
  • JJ: Wonderful St.Patrick’s Day post, balb. Thanks.
  • Independent Voter: ‘RCMP spies on Canadians’…gee, didnt see that one coming.
  • Independent Voter: As Elvis Prestley used to say ‘return to sender’
  • Independent Voter: Maybe Gods just proroguing.

Recent Trackbacks


Disclaimer: The writings, musing, comments, thoughts, and ideas, put forward within the stageleft.info domain belong solely to their individual authors who hold ultimate responsibility for them. While here be mindful of the words of Buddha: Believe nothing just because a so-called wise person said it. Believe nothing just because a belief is generally held. Believe nothing just because it is said in ancient books. Believe nothing just because it is said to be of divine origin. Believe nothing just because someone else believes it. Believe only what you yourself test and judge to be true.

Designed by Gabfire slightly modified by stageleft