My Sarah Palin As Blessed Virgin Mary Trumps Your Obama And Unicorn

Courtesy of Kathy Shaidle’s “Baby Jesus Wants You To Murder a Muzzi For Christmas” site, I came across this astonishing addition to the Sarah Palin Iconography, and inspired by an exchange with JJ, I thought I should bring it to your attention.

You will recall that the Furiosi were alternately scandalized and mocking about some of the more rococo portrayals of Obama last fall. However, this rendering of Sarah Palin as Virgin Mary is apparently a different matter.

It’s not her transformation from bright-eyed, giggly Everywoman to Steely Amazon that’s disturbing – as noted elsewhere, she has always been a bit of a cartoon, especially among the followers for whom X-Men comics marks the summit of western literary and graphic achievement.

What’s truly weird is the parody of Catholic images that symbolize the Virgin Mary. Note:
- a plain, round halo
- the crushing of The Snake
- the Marian blue dress
- the background of stars

I’m not sure what to make of the crotch chastely concealed by shotgun shells – I’m fairly sure that’s not standard issue imagery. I’m also not sure what to make of the fact that her Blackberry, whose screen presumably reads “Death Panels”, is obscured by her finger so that it appears to say “Dea Panei”, or “Goddess Bread”. And hey, what happened to her wedding ring?

I find it all weirdly funny, but I regret that it’s only available as a print. If it were a wall hanging on black velvet, I’d clean out their stock in a flash.

This entry was posted by balbulican on Sunday, December 13th, 2009 and is filed under (Right)WingNuts, Humour, Religion. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Recommend this Post @ Progressive Bloggers

19 Responses to “My Sarah Palin As Blessed Virgin Mary Trumps Your Obama And Unicorn”

  1. deBeauxOs on December 13th, 2009 at 2:23 pm

    Gee whiz – how difficult could it be to find a starving artist™ who would gladly accept a commission to render this image on black velvet for you, in UV-sensitive paint so that certain … ah, features would really pop when you turned on the black light?

  2. balbulican on December 13th, 2009 at 2:27 pm

    As JJ pointed out, there’s a least five doctoral theses in this poster for either a theologian or a Freudian.

  3. JJ on December 13th, 2009 at 2:53 pm

    I had to put on my glasses to read it, but one of her buttons says “Judges 4″, which is OT, so that’s a departure from Catholicism. I’m not sure what to make of the passage, but oddly enough it has a guy named “Barak” in it and it sounds like he gets nails hammered into his head at the end. Huh!? Yikes

  4. Robert McClelland on December 13th, 2009 at 2:59 pm

    the crushing of The Snake

    I thought this made it look like Palin had a lizard tail.

  5. balbulican on December 13th, 2009 at 3:14 pm

    It’s kinda cool that she’s stomping on the same edition of “Rules for Radicals” that I own. Strange, though, because her crazier fans have adopted it as their playbook.

  6. Sarah N. Dippity on December 13th, 2009 at 4:40 pm

    Does Stageleft have some kind of polling application? I ask because I am wrestling internally with a whole bunch of reactions to this, and I can’t figure out which response is the dominant one. The options are:

    a) Vulgar
    b) Funny
    c) Sick
    d) Blasphemous
    e) Insane.

    I’d like to settle this by poll, if possible.

    I note that this comes to you by way of Ms. Shaidle. I can’t help but note how well this imagery complements her attraction to Nazi pornography.

  7. Throbbin on December 13th, 2009 at 5:13 pm

    If she’s not winking, I’m not interested.

  8. deBeauxOs on December 13th, 2009 at 5:21 pm

    Throbbin – As I suggested to balbulican, get someone technically skilled to produce the version that rings your bell.

  9. Steve on December 13th, 2009 at 5:27 pm

    @Sarah N. Dippity
    Option F) All of the Above

  10. Cliff on December 13th, 2009 at 8:00 pm

    What it really reminds me of is the obsessive fetishism of underground cartoonist Robert Crumb. That queasy mix of attraction and revulsion is almost his trademark.
    http://williampaiva.files.wordpress.com/2009/06/crumb_sex.jpg

  11. Robert Gilcrease aka DataBrokers on December 14th, 2009 at 5:57 am

    It’s only because most conservative are thinking with their little heads when they see this woman. If you catch my drift.

  12. sooey on December 14th, 2009 at 7:27 am

    She IS the Madonna of politics, I think.

    The other Madonna.

  13. JJ on December 14th, 2009 at 12:20 pm

    The artist who did this thing has a blog (cache link) if you want to see some of his other work. Wingnut art, who knew?

  14. balbulican on December 14th, 2009 at 1:27 pm

    That’s amazing stuff. But I still think this is his masterpiece. Not only does it evoke the Virgin Mary and Rosie the Riveter, but it’s also reminiscent of those heroic fascists or Mao-era Cultural Revolution images

  15. JJ on December 14th, 2009 at 3:22 pm

    “But I still think this is his masterpiece”

    For sure, “Sarah Para Bellum” (”prepare for war!”) is obviously the artist’s magnum opus — nothing else even comes close to it for disturbing metaphors and Freudian symbolism.

    You know what else is weird — he’s depicted her as a lot more bulked up than she is in real life (she’s a runner and has that kind of physique, small-boned and light). Add to that the way she’s seated, legs wide apart like a guy would sit… and those transvestite-style platform shoes…

    This thing really is a surreptitious look into the deepest darkest recesses of the wingnut mind.

  16. Canuckguy on December 14th, 2009 at 3:35 pm

    Surely this poster is not made with her approval. Surely she has more sense than that. Surely.

    Can the subjects of such posters collect royalities?

  17. JimBobby on December 14th, 2009 at 4:44 pm
  18. Bina on December 15th, 2009 at 12:00 am

    Don’t forget that she’s perching on a wharf piling, Ă  la St. Simeon Stylites. (Or a pelican.)

    That upskirt POV makes the dual implications of her pose kind of unmissable, too…

  19. balbulican on December 15th, 2009 at 4:30 am

    Given that St. Simeon was an ascetic, I will opt for the pelican interpretation: its cry has been described as a “raucous honking”, which approximates Ms. Palin’s oratorical style.

Causes & Sponsors

Recent Comments

  • Ti-Guy: *sigh* The stalking begins again… The thing I hate most about blogs is that the “broken record”...
  • Patrick Ross: Hmmmmmmmmm. Nope, seems like nothing penetrates.
  • Ti-Guy: *sigh* The stalking begins again…
  • Patrick Ross: Riiiiiight, Tickles. Because bringing inconvenient details to your attention is “stalking”....
  • stageleft: @Throbbin: The beaver is noble?
  • Holly Stick: Like the blog comment I read a few years ago: “Why don’t you do like a Buddhist monk and...
  • Peter: “how many of them proudly display the noble Beaver on their websites?” None, perhaps, but they proudly...
  • Ti-Guy: *sigh* The stalking begins again…
  • Patrick Ross: Oh, yeah, Ti. The Conservatives are the only ones abusing 10%ers… Or not. Oops.
  • Ti-Guy: Ew. Anyway, since this post is about advice…one of my favourite journalists, David Olive, has picked up...

Recent Trackbacks


Disclaimer: The writings, musing, comments, thoughts, and ideas, put forward within the stageleft.info domain belong solely to their individual authors who hold ultimate responsibility for them. While here be mindful of the words of Buddha: Believe nothing just because a so-called wise person said it. Believe nothing just because a belief is generally held. Believe nothing just because it is said in ancient books. Believe nothing just because it is said to be of divine origin. Believe nothing just because someone else believes it. Believe only what you yourself test and judge to be true.

Designed by Gabfire slightly modified by stageleft