APTN License: The Dog Catches the Bus, and Then Asks – Now What?

(Being the second of four posts marking the tenth anniversary of the Aboriginal Peoples Television Network. Part Two here.)

With the launch of TVNC, for the first time northern viewers could watch a full day of northern programming, most of it in their own languages. There were a few complaints about the new channel, especially from non-Inuit viewers who were seeing for the first time what a caribou looks like when you take it apart. In fact, in Yellowknife we were told that people were referring to TVNC as “The Killing Channel”. But by and large people reacted very, very well to the new service.

In fact the new network began to attract curious viewers from some surprising places. The network’s primary audience was always intended to be northern. But its programming was up on satellite, so it could be pulled down by anyone who had a dish and knew where to look. TVNC began getting fan mail from southern Canada, from across the States, Australia, South and central America. Some of it was pretty weird – a young woman from Brussels who wanted the network to play her original composition “Poor Baby Seals, Oh Please, Don’t Die” – but most of it was appreciative and enthusiastic.

Because of the very positive reception of this service, the members of TVNC began to wonder whether there wasn’t potential to extend the service into the south. There was certainly a large and growing body of work and number of Aboriginal producers working in southern Canada. There seemed to be a lot of interest in the north, in Nunavut and in aboriginal affairs, much of it spurred by international events like the Rio Summit on Biodiversity. And there was a huge, unserved audience of Aboriginal viewers living in cities and in southern Canada, without access to TVNC.

It also seemed like an idea that could actually support itself. Cable companies charge their subscribers for the services they provide; if TVNC could provide a service that enough southern viewers were interested in watching, the revenues from the cable companies could provide a much needed infusion of cash into the broadcast organizations.

So in June 1997 the TVNC Board of Directors voted to move forward towards the establishment of a national Aboriginal television network. It required a huge leap of faith. TVNC was controlled by northerners, and accountable to northern viewers. This expansion would mean a whole new audience, new standards, a new level of diversity, and competition for viewers within a rapidly expanding universe of broadcast choices. There was also a fundamental difference in the way northern and southern broadcasters viewed the potential network. To the North, it was simple: they wanted the world to see what they were already doing – community programming in native languages. To southern Aboriginal producers, a nation network meant a high-end, competitive showcase for the best programming available. But there was lots of interest, and lost of goodwill, and the reward seemed worth the risk.

In November 1997, TVNC appeared before the CRTC’s hearings into Third National Networks and proposed that Aboriginal broadcasting should be considered alongside English and French as vital broadcasting services. And the Commission agreed. In Public Notice CRTC 1998-8 the CRTC recognizes TVNC as “a unique and significant undertaking” and that a national Aboriginal channel should be “widely available throughout Canada in order to serve the diverse needs of the various Aboriginal communities, as well as other Canadians.” The Commission also states it would consider any application by TVNC designed to achieve these objectives.

Green light. But TVNC, quite correctly, anticipated that Canada’s cable operators wouldn’t be tickled about being forced to give up a channel they could charge big bucks for. It was important to confirm that viewers really were interested. To get their ducks in a row before actually applying for a license, APTN commissioned an Angus Reid survey. To everyone’s surprise, they discovered that 66 % of Canadians support the idea of a national aboriginal TV network, even if it would mean displacing a currently offered service. Even more surprising, 68% of Canadians said they would be willing to pay a fifteen cent increase in their monthly cable bill to receive an Aboriginal network.

You couldn’t have asked for a better endorsement than that. So in June, 1998 TVNC submitted an application to the CRTC for a broadcast license for the Aboriginal Peoples Television Network (APTN), with a complete business plan and full details of the proposed network’s programming schedule, financial projections, technical specifications, marketing studies and structure.

The decision was announced in February 99. It was a dream come true. In its license APTN got virtually everything it wanted – mandatory service and carriage as part of the basic cable package, carriage on Express view and star choice, the two leading Direct-to-home broadcast services. AND…a subscriber rate of 15 cents per month, something less than a can of coke and a package of chips per year.

The night the decision was announced we all went out to the Pub Italia on Preston St. You’d think that we’d have gotten pretty rowdy. But as the evening went on we actually got quieter and quieter. Abe Tagalik, the CEO of APTN, summed up the reason at about 11 o’clock, just before we packed it in.

“You know what this means, right?” he said. “We have until September to put together a national TV network. Nobody sleeps for the next four months.”

This entry was posted by balbulican on Sunday, August 30th, 2009 and is filed under Canada, US Politics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Recommend this Post @ Progressive Bloggers

5 Responses to “APTN License: The Dog Catches the Bus, and Then Asks – Now What?”

  1. Throbbin on August 30th, 2009 at 10:46 pm

    Abe’s the man.

  2. balbulican on August 31st, 2009 at 6:58 am

    He was indeed. You should have seen the political shit he went through trying to put together/hold together the coalition. And it worked. Sigh. I miss that time.

  3. Niles on August 31st, 2009 at 2:42 pm

    So, develop programming for them, Mr. Balb. That should keep you anxious and hyper for awhile. You could do one of those Across Canada reality bike tour shows visiting Aboriginal communities and personalities. Your family musicians could even do a theme song!

    Not that I’m living vicariously or anything.

  4. balbulican on August 31st, 2009 at 6:54 pm

    They don’t need me, Niles. I was a deeply mediocre producer. Not a bad editor, though.

  5. Throbbin on August 31st, 2009 at 8:55 pm

    I think a road (and airplane) tour of Canadian aboriginal communities would be great!

    I also think APTN needs an adult-oriented sitcom. Something with teeth and a good sense of humour.

Causes & Sponsors

Recent Comments

  • Skinny Dipper: I read the Communist Manifesto in my first year Political Science course at the University of Western...
  • Ti-Guy: I’m skeptical that it is as bad as ‘Metro’ made it sound, although it sounds pretty bad. It’s...
  • Dr.Dawg: I know, cheap shot, but shouldn’t that be “Thinner Mike Duffy?”
  • Looney Canuck: Someone pointed it out to me this morning on the bus. I’m skeptical that it is as bad as...
  • Throbbin: I don’t like critical thinking. Gums up the brain.
  • Ti-Guy: “Kim Kierans, head of the King’s School of Journalism, was surprised to hear Duffy’s comments. She...
  • Mike Brock: I’m skeptical that carbon taxes within ranges we’d generally consider marginal would do much,...
  • Throbbin: What’s a Carbon Tax if it’s not a marginal tax-increase? It wouldn’t require “major...
  • Mike Brock: And by “outlawed”, I meant “outlined”. I mean, I’d put moving to carbon...
  • Mike Brock: At the end of the day, unpopular measures will still meet public scrutiny. Marginal tax increases are one...

Recent Trackbacks


Disclaimer: The writings, musing, comments, thoughts, and ideas, put forward within the stageleft.info domain belong solely to their individual authors who hold ultimate responsibility for them. While here be mindful of the words of Buddha: Believe nothing just because a so-called wise person said it. Believe nothing just because a belief is generally held. Believe nothing just because it is said in ancient books. Believe nothing just because it is said to be of divine origin. Believe nothing just because someone else believes it. Believe only what you yourself test and judge to be true.

Designed by Gabfire slightly modified by stageleft