Comments on: The Least Classy Exit Since Nixon’s http://www.stageleft.info/2009/07/06/the-least-classy-exit-since-nixons/ Fri, 12 Mar 2010 02:59:19 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Richard Evans http://www.stageleft.info/2009/07/06/the-least-classy-exit-since-nixons/comment-page-1/#comment-150951 Richard Evans Thu, 09 Jul 2009 14:33:41 +0000 http://www.stageleft.info/2009/07/06/the-least-classy-exit-since-nixons/#comment-150951 No, Robert, nothing's been hidden... We're having trouble getting the joomla db back up because of its size. The archive site (05 to 08) is back up and running though. You can find it here: http://no-libs.com/wordpress The main site should be back up and running (with all posts intact) by the beginning of next week... Unlike you, Robert, I have no fear of having my name attached to my words. Cheers!<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('150951','Richard Evans'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('150951','Richard Evans','No, Robert, nothing\'s been hidden... We\'re having trouble getting the joomla db back up because of its size. The archive site (05 to 08) is back up and running though. You can find it here: http:\/\/no-libs.com\/wordpress\r\n\r\nThe main site should be back up and running (with all posts intact) by the beginning of next week... Unlike you, Robert, I have no fear of having my name attached to my words.\r\n\r\nCheers!'); return false;">Quote</a></div> No, Robert, nothing’s been hidden… We’re having trouble getting the joomla db back up because of its size. The archive site (05 to 08) is back up and running though. You can find it here: http://no-libs.com/wordpress

The main site should be back up and running (with all posts intact) by the beginning of next week… Unlike you, Robert, I have no fear of having my name attached to my words.

Cheers!

Reply – Quote
]]> By: CC http://www.stageleft.info/2009/07/06/the-least-classy-exit-since-nixons/comment-page-1/#comment-150892 CC Wed, 08 Jul 2009 15:32:04 +0000 http://www.stageleft.info/2009/07/06/the-least-classy-exit-since-nixons/#comment-150892 Hi, Dick ... how's it going? Love the new look over at your blog -- exclusively soft core porn. I'm sure that's just the topic of conversation at PTA meetings when other parents ask you about your hobbies, then back away quickly when you mention it. Apparently, you've disappeared all the old content; you know, the defamatory stuff. Good thinking. All that stuff would have been awkward to explain in any legal proceedings. Sadly for you, Dick, Google has a long memory, as anyone can see if they Google on the combination of "Richard Evans" and "Calgary." I'm betting that's going to be awkward, too, the next time you run for Calgary City Council. Thanks for stopping by, Dick. Say 'hi' to the folks at NAMBLA for all of us.<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('150892','CC'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('150892','CC','Hi, Dick ... how\'s it going? Love the new look over at your blog -- exclusively soft core porn. I\'m sure that\'s just the topic of conversation at PTA meetings when other parents ask you about your hobbies, then back away quickly when you mention it.\r\n\r\nApparently, you\'ve disappeared all the old content; you know, the defamatory stuff. Good thinking. All that stuff would have been awkward to explain in any legal proceedings.\r\n\r\nSadly for you, Dick, Google has a long memory, as anyone can see if they Google on the combination of \"Richard Evans\" and \"Calgary.\" I\'m betting that\'s going to be awkward, too, the next time you run for Calgary City Council.\r\n\r\nThanks for stopping by, Dick. Say \'hi\' to the folks at NAMBLA for all of us.'); return false;">Quote</a></div> Hi, Dick … how’s it going? Love the new look over at your blog — exclusively soft core porn. I’m sure that’s just the topic of conversation at PTA meetings when other parents ask you about your hobbies, then back away quickly when you mention it.

Apparently, you’ve disappeared all the old content; you know, the defamatory stuff. Good thinking. All that stuff would have been awkward to explain in any legal proceedings.

Sadly for you, Dick, Google has a long memory, as anyone can see if they Google on the combination of “Richard Evans” and “Calgary.” I’m betting that’s going to be awkward, too, the next time you run for Calgary City Council.

Thanks for stopping by, Dick. Say ‘hi’ to the folks at NAMBLA for all of us.

Reply – Quote
]]> By: Richard Evans http://www.stageleft.info/2009/07/06/the-least-classy-exit-since-nixons/comment-page-1/#comment-150891 Richard Evans Wed, 08 Jul 2009 15:01:10 +0000 http://www.stageleft.info/2009/07/06/the-least-classy-exit-since-nixons/#comment-150891 Wow... CC still seems to be upset... poor thing...<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('150891','Richard Evans'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('150891','Richard Evans','Wow... CC still seems to be upset... poor thing...'); return false;">Quote</a></div> Wow… CC still seems to be upset… poor thing…
Reply – Quote
]]> By: CC http://www.stageleft.info/2009/07/06/the-least-classy-exit-since-nixons/comment-page-1/#comment-150887 CC Wed, 08 Jul 2009 14:07:14 +0000 http://www.stageleft.info/2009/07/06/the-least-classy-exit-since-nixons/#comment-150887 No one's fighting here, Balb. :-) I just think it's amusing to see how freaked out "Raphael" gets when someone starts poking at <i>his</i> secret identity. And, wow, that was some reaction, wouldn't you say? Not at <i>all</i> what you'd expect from someone who had a howling good time helping out someone else. I think I've made my point, don't you?<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('150887','CC'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('150887','CC','No one\'s fighting here, Balb. :-) I just think it\'s amusing to see how freaked out \"Raphael\" gets when someone starts poking at <i>his<\/i> secret identity. And, wow, that was some reaction, wouldn\'t you say? Not at <i>all<\/i> what you\'d expect from someone who had a howling good time helping out someone else.\r\n\r\nI think I\'ve made my point, don\'t you?'); return false;">Quote</a></div> No one’s fighting here, Balb. :-) I just think it’s amusing to see how freaked out “Raphael” gets when someone starts poking at his secret identity. And, wow, that was some reaction, wouldn’t you say? Not at all what you’d expect from someone who had a howling good time helping out someone else.

I think I’ve made my point, don’t you?

Reply – Quote
]]> By: balbulican http://www.stageleft.info/2009/07/06/the-least-classy-exit-since-nixons/comment-page-1/#comment-150886 balbulican Wed, 08 Jul 2009 14:03:13 +0000 http://www.stageleft.info/2009/07/06/the-least-classy-exit-since-nixons/#comment-150886 Gentlemen, you can't fight here - this is the War Room!<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('150886','balbulican'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('150886','balbulican','Gentlemen, you can\'t fight here - this is the War Room!'); return false;">Quote</a></div> Gentlemen, you can’t fight here – this is the War Room!
Reply – Quote
]]> By: Canuckguy http://www.stageleft.info/2009/07/06/the-least-classy-exit-since-nixons/comment-page-1/#comment-150883 Canuckguy Wed, 08 Jul 2009 13:50:27 +0000 http://www.stageleft.info/2009/07/06/the-least-classy-exit-since-nixons/#comment-150883 Why don't you two just get a room.<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('150883','Canuckguy'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('150883','Canuckguy','Why don\'t you two just get a room.'); return false;">Quote</a></div> Why don’t you two just get a room.
Reply – Quote
]]> By: CC http://www.stageleft.info/2009/07/06/the-least-classy-exit-since-nixons/comment-page-1/#comment-150880 CC Wed, 08 Jul 2009 13:42:43 +0000 http://www.stageleft.info/2009/07/06/the-least-classy-exit-since-nixons/#comment-150880 And by writing "Go ahead," Raphael, I'm assuming you just gave me your blessing to start tracking down your personal information. Am I reading that correctly? I just want to be <i>sure</i> so you can't come back later and whine about it. Please confirm that that's your position so I can post on my blog and invite my readers to track you down and send me whatever they learn. That's quite the corner you've painted yourself into, "Raphael," wouldn't you say?<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('150880','CC'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('150880','CC','And by writing \"Go ahead,\" Raphael, I\'m assuming you just gave me your blessing to start tracking down your personal information. Am I reading that correctly? I just want to be <i>sure<\/i> so you can\'t come back later and whine about it. Please confirm that that\'s your position so I can post on my blog and invite my readers to track you down and send me whatever they learn.\r\n\r\nThat\'s quite the corner you\'ve painted yourself into, \"Raphael,\" wouldn\'t you say?'); return false;">Quote</a></div> And by writing “Go ahead,” Raphael, I’m assuming you just gave me your blessing to start tracking down your personal information. Am I reading that correctly? I just want to be sure so you can’t come back later and whine about it. Please confirm that that’s your position so I can post on my blog and invite my readers to track you down and send me whatever they learn.

That’s quite the corner you’ve painted yourself into, “Raphael,” wouldn’t you say?

Reply – Quote
]]> By: Canuckguy http://www.stageleft.info/2009/07/06/the-least-classy-exit-since-nixons/comment-page-1/#comment-150878 Canuckguy Wed, 08 Jul 2009 13:26:03 +0000 http://www.stageleft.info/2009/07/06/the-least-classy-exit-since-nixons/#comment-150878 MEEOW! Somebody got their knickers in a twist.<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('150878','Canuckguy'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('150878','Canuckguy','MEEOW!\r\nSomebody got their knickers in a twist.'); return false;">Quote</a></div> MEEOW!
Somebody got their knickers in a twist.
Reply – Quote
]]> By: Raphael http://www.stageleft.info/2009/07/06/the-least-classy-exit-since-nixons/comment-page-1/#comment-150877 Raphael Wed, 08 Jul 2009 13:24:43 +0000 http://www.stageleft.info/2009/07/06/the-least-classy-exit-since-nixons/#comment-150877 Because you're a lowlife cretin, Rob. Go ahead. Make my "Day".<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('150877','Raphael'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('150877','Raphael','Because you\'re a lowlife cretin, Rob.\r\n\r\nGo ahead. Make my \"Day\".'); return false;">Quote</a></div> Because you’re a lowlife cretin, Rob.

Go ahead. Make my “Day”.

Reply – Quote
]]> By: CC http://www.stageleft.info/2009/07/06/the-least-classy-exit-since-nixons/comment-page-1/#comment-150876 CC Wed, 08 Jul 2009 13:08:01 +0000 http://www.stageleft.info/2009/07/06/the-least-classy-exit-since-nixons/#comment-150876 By the way, Raphael (and the proprietors of this particular blog can decide if this comment violates the bounds of decorum), there's a certain hypocrisy on your part given that, once upon a time, you wrote about <a href="http://unambig.wordpress.com/2009/02/08/the-dangers-of-posting-under-your-real-name/" rel="nofollow">The Dangers Of Posting Under Your Real Name</a> while, only a few months later, you absolutely <i>gleefully</i> participated in splashing my name and picture all over the Intertoobz. Apparently, you value <i>your</i> anonymity while not giving a shit about <i>mine</i>. That's pretty rich. And here's where I'm possibly going to violate some decorum. I want to know Raphael's personal information. As much of it as I can get. Real name, address, phone number ... the works. But <b>privately</b>. I have no intention of publishing it. Yet. Unless "Raphael" continues to act like the unprincipled bully he is. And, frankly, I see nothing untoward about wanting this information. Raphael clearly enjoyed my outing <i>immensely</i>, so it seems only fair that someone return the favour, wouldn't you say, Raphael? Seriously, Raph, would you object to someone splashing the personal info of you and your family all over the place? If not, then just publish it and get it over with. If you would, then you can explain why you so joyfully participated in what happened with <i>mine</i>. So let's hear it, "Raphael." If you still want to protect your anonymity, why are you so hypocritical as to strip it from someone else? And while you're thinking of a good answer for that, yes, I <i>do</i> want any of Raphael's personal information you can send me. But privately only. Let's start with his real name and go from there. Or is that being a big bully because <i>I'd</i> be doing it?<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('150876','CC'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('150876','CC','By the way, Raphael (and the proprietors of this particular blog can decide if this comment violates the bounds of decorum), there\'s a certain hypocrisy on your part given that, once upon a time, you wrote about <a href=\"http:\/\/unambig.wordpress.com\/2009\/02\/08\/the-dangers-of-posting-under-your-real-name\/\" rel=\"nofollow\">The Dangers Of Posting Under Your Real Name<\/a> while, only a few months later, you absolutely <i>gleefully<\/i> participated in splashing my name and picture all over the Intertoobz. Apparently, you value <i>your<\/i> anonymity while not giving a shit about <i>mine<\/i>. That\'s pretty rich. And here\'s where I\'m possibly going to violate some decorum.\r\n\r\nI want to know Raphael\'s personal information. As much of it as I can get. Real name, address, phone number ... the works. But <b>privately<\/b>. I have no intention of publishing it. Yet. Unless \"Raphael\" continues to act like the unprincipled bully he is.\r\n\r\nAnd, frankly, I see nothing untoward about wanting this information. Raphael clearly enjoyed my outing <i>immensely<\/i>, so it seems only fair that someone return the favour, wouldn\'t you say, Raphael? Seriously, Raph, would you object to someone splashing the personal info of you and your family all over the place? If not, then just publish it and get it over with. If you would, then you can explain why you so joyfully participated in what happened with <i>mine<\/i>.\r\n\r\nSo let\'s hear it, \"Raphael.\" If you still want to protect your anonymity, why are you so hypocritical as to strip it from someone else? And while you\'re thinking of a good answer for that, yes, I <i>do<\/i> want any of Raphael\'s personal information you can send me. But privately only. Let\'s start with his real name and go from there.\r\n\r\nOr is that being a big bully because <i>I\'d<\/i> be doing it?'); return false;">Quote</a></div> By the way, Raphael (and the proprietors of this particular blog can decide if this comment violates the bounds of decorum), there’s a certain hypocrisy on your part given that, once upon a time, you wrote about The Dangers Of Posting Under Your Real Name while, only a few months later, you absolutely gleefully participated in splashing my name and picture all over the Intertoobz. Apparently, you value your anonymity while not giving a shit about mine. That’s pretty rich. And here’s where I’m possibly going to violate some decorum.

I want to know Raphael’s personal information. As much of it as I can get. Real name, address, phone number … the works. But privately. I have no intention of publishing it. Yet. Unless “Raphael” continues to act like the unprincipled bully he is.

And, frankly, I see nothing untoward about wanting this information. Raphael clearly enjoyed my outing immensely, so it seems only fair that someone return the favour, wouldn’t you say, Raphael? Seriously, Raph, would you object to someone splashing the personal info of you and your family all over the place? If not, then just publish it and get it over with. If you would, then you can explain why you so joyfully participated in what happened with mine.

So let’s hear it, “Raphael.” If you still want to protect your anonymity, why are you so hypocritical as to strip it from someone else? And while you’re thinking of a good answer for that, yes, I do want any of Raphael’s personal information you can send me. But privately only. Let’s start with his real name and go from there.

Or is that being a big bully because I’d be doing it?

Reply – Quote
]]> By: sooey http://www.stageleft.info/2009/07/06/the-least-classy-exit-since-nixons/comment-page-1/#comment-150869 sooey Wed, 08 Jul 2009 11:39:28 +0000 http://www.stageleft.info/2009/07/06/the-least-classy-exit-since-nixons/#comment-150869 Otherwise known as rats jumping the sinking ship of Sarah Palin.<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('150869','sooey'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('150869','sooey','Otherwise known as rats jumping the sinking ship of Sarah Palin.'); return false;">Quote</a></div> Otherwise known as rats jumping the sinking ship of Sarah Palin.
Reply – Quote
]]> By: CC http://www.stageleft.info/2009/07/06/the-least-classy-exit-since-nixons/comment-page-1/#comment-150862 CC Wed, 08 Jul 2009 06:57:24 +0000 http://www.stageleft.info/2009/07/06/the-least-classy-exit-since-nixons/#comment-150862 Just to be clear, when I wrote "Sarah's right," I was referring to previous commenter "Sarah N. Dippity." Sarah Palin is an indescribable idiot. That's not misogyny, it's just an observation -- one made by numerous *conservative* pundits as well.<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('150862','CC'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('150862','CC','Just to be clear, when I wrote \"Sarah\'s right,\" I was referring to previous commenter \"Sarah N. Dippity.\" Sarah Palin is an indescribable idiot. That\'s not misogyny, it\'s just an observation -- one made by numerous *conservative* pundits as well.'); return false;">Quote</a></div> Just to be clear, when I wrote “Sarah’s right,” I was referring to previous commenter “Sarah N. Dippity.” Sarah Palin is an indescribable idiot. That’s not misogyny, it’s just an observation — one made by numerous *conservative* pundits as well.
Reply – Quote
]]> By: CC http://www.stageleft.info/2009/07/06/the-least-classy-exit-since-nixons/comment-page-1/#comment-150859 CC Wed, 08 Jul 2009 05:49:10 +0000 http://www.stageleft.info/2009/07/06/the-least-classy-exit-since-nixons/#comment-150859 Let us all notice how Raphael, while accusing me of Sarah Palin "misogyny" (a bullshit accusation), still has no problem with Wendy Sullivan's reprehensible bigotry. Nice try, Raph. Now how about you address the issue I actually raised instead of being such an evasive little weasel? And Sarah's right, Raph -- people accused Sarah Palin of being an imbecile not because they were misogynists, but because Sarah Palin was an imbecile. Sometimes, a cigar is just a cigar.<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('150859','CC'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('150859','CC','Let us all notice how Raphael, while accusing me of Sarah Palin \"misogyny\" (a bullshit accusation), still has no problem with Wendy Sullivan\'s reprehensible bigotry. Nice try, Raph. Now how about you address the issue I actually raised instead of being such an evasive little weasel?\r\n\r\nAnd Sarah\'s right, Raph -- people accused Sarah Palin of being an imbecile not because they were misogynists, but because Sarah Palin was an imbecile. Sometimes, a cigar is just a cigar.'); return false;">Quote</a></div> Let us all notice how Raphael, while accusing me of Sarah Palin “misogyny” (a bullshit accusation), still has no problem with Wendy Sullivan’s reprehensible bigotry. Nice try, Raph. Now how about you address the issue I actually raised instead of being such an evasive little weasel?

And Sarah’s right, Raph — people accused Sarah Palin of being an imbecile not because they were misogynists, but because Sarah Palin was an imbecile. Sometimes, a cigar is just a cigar.

Reply – Quote
]]> By: Sarah N. Dippity http://www.stageleft.info/2009/07/06/the-least-classy-exit-since-nixons/comment-page-1/#comment-150851 Sarah N. Dippity Wed, 08 Jul 2009 02:03:38 +0000 http://www.stageleft.info/2009/07/06/the-least-classy-exit-since-nixons/#comment-150851 Raphael... Uh...no. Hillary isn't dumb. Neither was Condoleeza Rice. However, Sarah Palin is.<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('150851','Sarah N. Dippity'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('150851','Sarah N. Dippity','Raphael...\r\n\r\nUh...no. Hillary isn\'t dumb. Neither was Condoleeza Rice. However, Sarah Palin is.'); return false;">Quote</a></div> Raphael…

Uh…no. Hillary isn’t dumb. Neither was Condoleeza Rice. However, Sarah Palin is.

Reply – Quote
]]> By: Raphael http://www.stageleft.info/2009/07/06/the-least-classy-exit-since-nixons/comment-page-1/#comment-150850 Raphael Wed, 08 Jul 2009 01:50:58 +0000 http://www.stageleft.info/2009/07/06/the-least-classy-exit-since-nixons/#comment-150850 <a href='#comment-150849' rel="nofollow">@Throbbin</a> - I know, eh? Just like that dumb blonde bimbo Hillary. Wonder when she'll be starring in her own porno video. Gee, she's so dumb. Did I mention how dumb she is? Typical blonde. Bimbo. Dumb.<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('150850','Raphael'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('150850','Raphael','<a href=\'#comment-150849\' rel=\"nofollow\">@Throbbin<\/a> - I know, eh? Just like that dumb blonde bimbo Hillary. Wonder when she\'ll be starring in her own porno video. Gee, she\'s so dumb. Did I mention how dumb she is? Typical blonde. Bimbo. Dumb.'); return false;">Quote</a></div> @Throbbin – I know, eh? Just like that dumb blonde bimbo Hillary. Wonder when she’ll be starring in her own porno video. Gee, she’s so dumb. Did I mention how dumb she is? Typical blonde. Bimbo. Dumb.
Reply – Quote
]]>