A Brief Summary of the Burkha Debate, Sarkozy Position

a) We find it appalling that your religion dictates what you may and may not wear.
b) We therefore propose to dictate what you may and may not wear.

Questions?

This entry was posted by balbulican on Wednesday, June 24th, 2009 and is filed under Canada. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Recommend this Post @ Progressive Bloggers

15 Responses to “A Brief Summary of the Burkha Debate, Sarkozy Position”

  1. Treehugger on June 24th, 2009 at 10:38 am

    OR…..

    Those things don’t look very French, you can’t wear them.

  2. Candace on June 24th, 2009 at 2:50 pm

    The French have always been fashionistas, no? Designers are having a hard time making ends meet, as who is going to spend $ on Chanel if they’re going to cover it up in a burkha?

    “It’s the economy, stupid”

  3. Throbbin on June 24th, 2009 at 3:06 pm

    I’ve always had a beef with Protestants, and their pressed kakhis and blue sweaters!

  4. stageleft on June 24th, 2009 at 5:25 pm

    And he was me thinking I was the only one in the bunker who listened to Lowell Green….

  5. Raphael on June 24th, 2009 at 6:34 pm

    Have you seen Irshad Manji’s Faith without Fear when she goes to Yemen and tries on some Niqabs? Unintentional humour when she asks for the most liberal and progressive niqab and the store clerk hands her a black curtain that looks like every other black curtain in the store.

    But hey, I guess some people enjoy wearing black curtains. I certainly wouldn’t advise it in Toronto during the summer strike.

  6. balbulican on June 24th, 2009 at 7:56 pm

    “I guess some people enjoy wearing black curtains.”

    Roman Catholic nuns and Italian widows among them. Certainly their choice or wardrobe should have nothing to do with what you, I, or Sakozy think.

  7. Raphael on June 24th, 2009 at 11:27 pm

    Balbulican,

    You do have a point. But insofar as it is a cultural traditional steeped in the modesty aspect of both religions, the Catholic and Christian derivatives have greatly liberalized and changed their fundamentalist approach in mainstream society. In western society only the very fringe still adhere to such orthodoxy. Perhaps Sarkozy is hoping for a liberalization of the symbols of political Islam?

  8. JonZor on June 25th, 2009 at 4:30 am

    Raph: “Perhaps Sarkozy is hoping for a liberalization of the symbols of political Islam?”

    Since when was Sarkozy the bastion of Islamic reform? This sort of change has to come from within Islam, not from an outlandish centre-right French leader. Change will only come from increased integration into mainstream society. Of course there would still be fringe crazies, but as you say, there always are.

    If you outlaw cultural traditions, you push more and more people to it, even those who had been moving towards it.

  9. Dr.Dawg on June 25th, 2009 at 8:15 am

    What JonZor said.

    I once got into a bitter debate with a person of the female persuasion over at David Thompson’s blog when (IIRC) I compared the burqa with high heels and miniskirts and noted that in each case it could be argued that women’s bodies were a site of cultural struggle: both objectify women. She wasn’t having that, but I think I was on to something.

  10. Canuckguy on June 25th, 2009 at 8:42 am

    What’s next? Outlaw the Scottish kilt?
    That dumb piece of dressware my anscestors must have dreamed up over several whiskeys. Probably convenient when taking care of business with the sheep.

  11. Canuckguy on June 25th, 2009 at 8:43 am

    Ahh jeez, just noticed you don’t have the editing function anymore.

  12. Mike on June 25th, 2009 at 11:19 am

    @Canuckguy – Over my cold dead body….laddy.

    I think we should make Lowell wear a burkha…and he should have to do it with David Warren wearing bondage gear…like they do on weekends.

  13. skyler on June 25th, 2009 at 12:19 pm

    this anti-burkha legislation is steeped in ethnocentrism and cultural mis-communications. Poor, manly Muslim, young people lit France on fire 2 years ago, talk about a divide between traditional french society and its new immigrant population. i’ve always kind of wondered is this a debate between gender equality or freedom of religion?

  14. balbulican on June 25th, 2009 at 2:16 pm

    It’s certainly not about gender equality, given the tender concern most of the burkhaphobes show for women’s rights in other areas. You can’t advance women’s rights by moving the right to dictate their wardrobe from their religion to the State.

  15. jeffryh on June 26th, 2009 at 3:11 pm

    One element left out of the burkha debate: enforcement.

    Those who are against the use of burkhas will have to tell us how they propose to enforce a ban. Will they arrest all users? Strip them of their garments? Prosecute them in Superior Court?

    And how will we define a burkha exactly? Will wedding veils be allowed? Hats with veils? Hats with veils with baggy clothing? Etc.

    It would be nice to know the cost of this enforcement too.

Causes & Sponsors

Recent Comments

  • Skinny Dipper: I read the Communist Manifesto in my first year Political Science course at the University of Western...
  • Ti-Guy: I’m skeptical that it is as bad as ‘Metro’ made it sound, although it sounds pretty bad. It’s...
  • Dr.Dawg: I know, cheap shot, but shouldn’t that be “Thinner Mike Duffy?”
  • Looney Canuck: Someone pointed it out to me this morning on the bus. I’m skeptical that it is as bad as...
  • Throbbin: I don’t like critical thinking. Gums up the brain.
  • Ti-Guy: “Kim Kierans, head of the King’s School of Journalism, was surprised to hear Duffy’s comments. She...
  • Mike Brock: I’m skeptical that carbon taxes within ranges we’d generally consider marginal would do much,...
  • Throbbin: What’s a Carbon Tax if it’s not a marginal tax-increase? It wouldn’t require “major...
  • Mike Brock: And by “outlawed”, I meant “outlined”. I mean, I’d put moving to carbon...
  • Mike Brock: At the end of the day, unpopular measures will still meet public scrutiny. Marginal tax increases are one...

Recent Trackbacks


Disclaimer: The writings, musing, comments, thoughts, and ideas, put forward within the stageleft.info domain belong solely to their individual authors who hold ultimate responsibility for them. While here be mindful of the words of Buddha: Believe nothing just because a so-called wise person said it. Believe nothing just because a belief is generally held. Believe nothing just because it is said in ancient books. Believe nothing just because it is said to be of divine origin. Believe nothing just because someone else believes it. Believe only what you yourself test and judge to be true.

Designed by Gabfire slightly modified by stageleft