Overturn The Results Of The Last Election?

Gee….. that would be serious if it were true – but it isn’t

Last weekend we learned that the NDP under Jack Layton has been in talks with the separatist Bloc Quebecois for quite some time to form a plan seize power and over throw the government. This would overturn the results of the last election held just six weeks ago without seeking consent from we the Canadian voters.

Regardless of what happens, and when it happens, the results of the last election will not change and every party will still hold exactly the same number of seats they hold today.

It behooves the bunker to remind folks once again that they vote for an MP, and that is all they vote for.

The rest of the page is full of equal nonsense – but some of the twitter comments are funny.

This entry was posted by stageleft on Monday, December 1st, 2008 and is filed under Canada, Canadian Politics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Recommend this Post @ Progressive Bloggers

15 Responses to “Overturn The Results Of The Last Election?”

  1. stageleft on December 1st, 2008 at 6:39 pm

    More from around the URQ-o-Sphere

    Christian Conservative

    Why bother winning an election…
    …when you can just steal one after the fact?

    Introducing Prime Minister Dion, who will go down in history as the first undemocratic, backroom installed Prime Minister in our history.

    Welcome to Zimbabwe my friends… where elections really don’t matter.

    Powell lucas in the comments at Just Right

    How about this little scenario: Harper’s Conservatives go down. Resentment in Alberta at seeing another western PM get pounded by eastern interests reaches the boiling point. Harper, and a number of Alberta MPs resign. They come back to Albrta to form a separatist party and are joined by a host of like-minded MPPs from the Stelmach government.
    Following another attempted rape of Alberta by the unholy triumverate in Ottawa, the new party sweeps into power and we finally get rid of the eastern albatross around our necks. And we can do it within the rules put in place by the Nutty Professor. Delicious irony, anyone.

    Proud To Be Canadian

    Unelected Prime Minister Dion coming—as decided by unelected Liberals and other socialists

    Should we clue them in that Stephane Dion was actually elected?

  2. balbulican on December 1st, 2008 at 7:35 pm

    Here’s a nice one from the CBC site:

    ‘These Traitors have comited the greatest sin to a democracy, They have decided that their wants and desires are more important than us the people. It is the DUTY of every patriotic Canadian to due all harm possible to these traitors and enemies of Canadian democracy!”

  3. JimBobby on December 1st, 2008 at 7:54 pm

    Whooee! My MP, Diane Finley, says it’s “a slap in the face for democracy.” Back in 2004 Harper wrote to Adrienne Clarkson imploring her to consider a coalition should the Martin minority fail. Was that a slap in the face for democracy? A majority of Canadians voted for parties other than the Cons. The Con’s only got 37.65% of the vote on October 14th.

    Them’s some wingy wingnuts yer quotin’, fellers. Yeow!

    JB

  4. Arwen on December 1st, 2008 at 7:57 pm

    Dain bramage. That’s got to be what’s going on here.

  5. Frank Frink on December 1st, 2008 at 8:07 pm

    Remember what happened to Louis del Grande in David Cronenberg’s Scanners?

    There’s a lot of that going around in URQ-land.

  6. balbulican on December 1st, 2008 at 8:09 pm

    Don’t Get Any Onya.

  7. Frank Frink on December 1st, 2008 at 8:25 pm

    I wore a Hazmat suit ;-)

  8. Throbbin on December 1st, 2008 at 8:51 pm

    Of all the dirty rotten timing in the world, why now?

    Today we had our last day of classes for the semester. It’s examples like this that really illustrate how things work in politics and government – if I didn’t already know the workings of the party system and the westminster parliament, this would have been a perfect way to learn it.

    Shame really…things will have settled down by the time winter semester begins.

  9. US Election On Best Political Blogs » Blog Archive » stageleft:. life on the left side : Overturn The Results Of The … on December 1st, 2008 at 10:51 pm

    [...] stageleft:. life on the left side : Overturn The Results Of The … Regardless of what happens, and when it happens, the results of the last election will not change and every party will still hold exactly the same number of seats they hold today. It behooves the bunker to remind folks once again that … [...]

  10. Candace on December 1st, 2008 at 11:21 pm

    Lots of percentages being thrown around. What percent of the popular vote did Chretien have for his last majority?

    How many seats & % points did Dion lose this time, and you’re okay with him running the country?

  11. balbulican on December 1st, 2008 at 11:30 pm

    Candace, coupla points. The Prime Minister doesn’t “run” the country. I realize Harperophiles tend to forget that, but we don’t have a President up here. The Prime Minister heads a party which temporarily forms a government.

    Nor do Canadians vote for a Prime Minister. They vote for a member of Parliament. Dion won exactly one seat: his own.

    Your numbers are meaningless. We’re not talking about a Liberal or Dion Government: it’s a coalition.

  12. Throbbin on December 1st, 2008 at 11:36 pm

    If it makes you feel better Candace – we can call it the “Coalition of the Willing”. Has a nice ring to it.

  13. Frank Frink on December 1st, 2008 at 11:49 pm

    Candace, I don’t believe anyone has approached a majority of the popular vote in Canada since Mulroney’s big 1984 sweep (211 seats, just slightly over 50% of the pop. vote). The Big Chin lost 42 seats and was down to 43 point something of the popular vote in 1988 but still had a majority in parliament. Somehow, I think we now largely regret that 1984 electoral blip.

  14. Throbbin on December 2nd, 2008 at 1:42 am

    Here’s to hoping for a few years at least of coalition governments.

    Even as a card-carrying partisan, it’s nice to see the Liberals and NDP play nice. Cooperating in a coalition government will help keep everyone honest. And in the long run it could severely undermine the Bloc Quebec Sovereignty movement.

    Chantal Hebert got it right earlier tonight in At Issue – the Bloc campaigned less on Sovereignty and more on looking out for Quebecers in the recent election. With the Bloc agreeing in writing to at least 18 months of support, it makes it very hard for Duceppe to claim Ottawa is ignoring Quebec’s interests, especially regarding budgetary measures.

    If this coalition manages in implementing progressive policies, the Libs and NDP could end up siphoning off alot of support from the Bloc.

    Heres to hoping for the best.

    (Also…Anyone else notice all 3 coalition leaders are from Quebec? They can’t possibly complain after this, can they?)

  15. balbulican on December 2nd, 2008 at 7:20 am

    Given the time of year and depressing cold front moving in, how about the Coalition of the Woolens?

Causes & Sponsors

Recent Comments

  • JimBobby: Originally Posted By CanuckguyBad decision makers have to be weeded out. How do we weed out those bad...
  • balbulican: JB, that’s sheer genius. Instead of demonstrating their contempt for Earth Hour by running their...
  • JimBobby: Whooee! Them teabaggers is sure as hell whacko enough to pour buckets of blood. I reckon this...
  • balbulican: It’s a difficult chore they face, claiming simultaneously to be (a) an embattled, oppressed...
  • Shiner: The fascinating thing about the Canadian teabaggers is that their guys are in power. As stupid as it is to...
  • stageleft: What I have a problem with is the state spying on people because it doesn’t like what they say or...
  • Canuckguy: @stageleft - Well jeez, somebody has to do it. The deciders for christ’s sake. There is a legimate...
  • stageleft: @Ti-Guy: I checked the moderation pen when I got home (ah spring… when bikes and BBQ’s reign...
  • stageleft: @Canuckguy: And just who gets to decide what makes people dangerous Canuckguy? Who gets to decide who is...
  • Canuckguy: @Ti-Guy – Spoken like a true enemy of law and order. Just what in my statement is so offensive? Is...

Recent Trackbacks


Disclaimer: The writings, musing, comments, thoughts, and ideas, put forward within the stageleft.info domain belong solely to their individual authors who hold ultimate responsibility for them. While here be mindful of the words of Buddha: Believe nothing just because a so-called wise person said it. Believe nothing just because a belief is generally held. Believe nothing just because it is said in ancient books. Believe nothing just because it is said to be of divine origin. Believe nothing just because someone else believes it. Believe only what you yourself test and judge to be true.

Designed by Gabfire slightly modified by stageleft