Honesty in Blogging

It’s not often that we come across a brutally honest post in the blogosphere.  Here in the Bunker, we applaud such efforts even when the post in question makes an admission so frank and self defeating as to wonder if the writer realizes the point they were trying to make in the first place. Bloggers rarely advertise their own gullibility and desperation.  Kudos I guess.  In any event, we agree whole-heartedly with all of it but have to wonder about the sanity of any individual who would go to a so-called faith healer for a legitimate medical problem.  We’ll keep that in mind when reading all of his future posts.

This entry was posted by Treehugger on Wednesday, February 27th, 2008 and is filed under (Right)WingNuts. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Recommend this Post @ Progressive Bloggers

5 Responses to “Honesty in Blogging”

  1. balbulican on February 27th, 2008 at 10:50 am

    This is a good reminder that behind even the most offensive blogging persona lurks a human being. I should remember that more often.

    I have a lot of sympathy for desperate folks who seek miracles. My mom was a very smart and very hard-headed woman, but when she was dying of cancer she flew to Fatima in search of a cure. It didn’t help.

    But the English language doesn’t contain vocabulary strong enough to express my loathing for the parasites who knowingly prey on the faithful of any stripe by offering the hope of miraculous respite. And anyone in doubt that that’s exactly what they’re doing is advised to read James Randi’s “The Faith Healers”, and find out how the multi million dollar corporations run by Peter Popoff, W.V. Grant, Leroy Jenkins, Oral Roberts, and Pat Robertson really work, and cynical these vendors of false hope actually are.

    Unfortunately the folks who would benefit most from this book probably don’t read much.

  2. dirk on February 27th, 2008 at 5:09 pm

    do I detect a hint of sarcasm or perhaps intellectual “superiority”.
    Come on cut the guy a bit slack.

  3. Arwen on February 27th, 2008 at 7:09 pm

    When I was 8 there was a girl who lived near me – a smart, funny, warm person who was, while we lived there, one of my best friends – and she had a problem with her eyes that made it hard for her to read. She also had some serious family stress and economic lack.
    There were not feasible medical solutions at the time for kids (although now there are surgical solutions, I believe). So her mom took her to a faith healer; one of the big ones, but I don’t remember which. I DO remember her hope beforehand, and afterward, how she took it on herself. “I didn’t believe enough”.
    It made me mad at 8 years old, and it makes me both angry and sad, now. They didn’t have enough money to spend, and she already had more emotional stress and self-doubt than a kid her age should have.
    I hope things are better for her, wherever she is.

  4. stageleft on February 27th, 2008 at 9:23 pm

    Unfortunately this sort of thing is all too common in all belief structures and I hope that CS’s personal faith is not too negatively impacted by the discovery of a charlatan in its’ midst.

  5. balbulican on February 28th, 2008 at 6:29 am

    “do I detect a hint of sarcasm or perhaps intellectual “superiority”.”

    I’m afraid detecting a hint of “intellectual superiority” in discussions about Scenty is like detecting a hint of height watching Will Chamberlain in conversation with Warwick Davis.

Causes & Sponsors

Recent Comments

  • ck: Oh my! Why am I not surprised?
  • stageleft: Apparently free thinkers are bad as well [ source ]
  • Skinny Dipper: I read the Communist Manifesto in my first year Political Science course at the University of Western...
  • Ti-Guy: I’m skeptical that it is as bad as ‘Metro’ made it sound, although it sounds pretty bad. It’s...
  • Dr.Dawg: I know, cheap shot, but shouldn’t that be “Thinner Mike Duffy?”
  • Looney Canuck: Someone pointed it out to me this morning on the bus. I’m skeptical that it is as bad as...
  • Throbbin: I don’t like critical thinking. Gums up the brain.
  • Ti-Guy: “Kim Kierans, head of the King’s School of Journalism, was surprised to hear Duffy’s comments. She...
  • Mike Brock: I’m skeptical that carbon taxes within ranges we’d generally consider marginal would do much,...
  • Throbbin: What’s a Carbon Tax if it’s not a marginal tax-increase? It wouldn’t require “major...

Recent Trackbacks


Disclaimer: The writings, musing, comments, thoughts, and ideas, put forward within the stageleft.info domain belong solely to their individual authors who hold ultimate responsibility for them. While here be mindful of the words of Buddha: Believe nothing just because a so-called wise person said it. Believe nothing just because a belief is generally held. Believe nothing just because it is said in ancient books. Believe nothing just because it is said to be of divine origin. Believe nothing just because someone else believes it. Believe only what you yourself test and judge to be true.

Designed by Gabfire slightly modified by stageleft