…is whoever happens to be leading the polls among the Democratic candidates - according to URQ pundits and bloggers, of course. Mind you, that Absolute Worst Possible Choice changes as the lead shifts over successive primaries. Whoever is leading is the worst, though.
As long as Hillary Clinton led the polls, the line in the Moronosphere has been: “Oh, God, I can’t believe what a terrible set of candidates they’re fielding, but Hillary…HILLARY…that would be the ABSOLUTE WORST!”
But of course, that’s when she was leading. Then came Iowa.
Here’s a little experiment. Pick five of your favourite, REALLY stupid URQ bloggers. (I personally suggest one whose idea of “political commentary” is badly photoshopped images, of, like (snicker) Hillary peeing (haw haw) STANDING UP LIKE A GUY! You know, that kind of sophistication.
Anyway, choose your five favourite cretins, and count the number of really asinine posts currently on their site about Clinton.
Then count the minutes until the Absolute Worst Possible Candidate stops being Hillary and starts looking a little…darker.
UPDATE: an amusing link from the Shmohawk, re Huckenfreude. Heh.
I personally suggest one whose idea of “political commentary” is badly photoshopped images, of, like (snicker) Hillary peeing (haw haw) STANDING UP LIKE A GUY! You know, that kind of sophistication.
Come on, I was drunk when I posted that and took it down weeks ago. I’m working on digitaly inserting her in a 2 Girls 1 Cup video as we speak.
I don’t think she’s the worst candidate out there. She is the worst of the front runners of either party though.
Go Obama for the Dems. Rudy (9/11) or McCain for the the Reps.
I think McCain is the best person for the job.