Comments on: In Case You Needed Further Proof http://www.stageleft.info/2007/12/20/in-case-you-needed-further-proof/ Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:41:16 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Post of the Day for December 20, 2007 | Adam's Blog http://www.stageleft.info/2007/12/20/in-case-you-needed-further-proof/comment-page-1/#comment-128819 Post of the Day for December 20, 2007 | Adam's Blog Tue, 25 Dec 2007 00:19:07 +0000 http://www.stageleft.info/2007/12/20/in-case-you-needed-further-proof/#comment-128819 [...] Pingback by Stageleft:. Life on the [lower] left side » Blog Archive » In Case You Needed Further Proof [...]<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('128819','Post of the Day for December 20, 2007 | Adam\'s Blog'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('128819','Post of the Day for December 20, 2007 | Adam\'s Blog','[...] Pingback by Stageleft:. Life on the [lower] left side » Blog Archive » In Case You Needed Further Proof [...]'); return false;">Quote</a></div> [...] Pingback by Stageleft:. Life on the [lower] left side » Blog Archive » In Case You Needed Further Proof [...]
Reply – Quote
]]> By: nastyboy http://www.stageleft.info/2007/12/20/in-case-you-needed-further-proof/comment-page-1/#comment-128761 nastyboy Sat, 22 Dec 2007 02:20:36 +0000 http://www.stageleft.info/2007/12/20/in-case-you-needed-further-proof/#comment-128761 lol Unfortunately the Donkey and the Pineapple could never agree on what to name these holiest of days. Drama queens.<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('128761','nastyboy'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('128761','nastyboy','lol\r\n\r\nUnfortunately the Donkey and the Pineapple could never agree on what to name these holiest of days.\r\n\r\nDrama queens.'); return false;">Quote</a></div> lol

Unfortunately the Donkey and the Pineapple could never agree on what to name these holiest of days.

Drama queens.

Reply – Quote
]]> By: Mike http://www.stageleft.info/2007/12/20/in-case-you-needed-further-proof/comment-page-1/#comment-128755 Mike Fri, 21 Dec 2007 19:25:20 +0000 http://www.stageleft.info/2007/12/20/in-case-you-needed-further-proof/#comment-128755 1. Kucinich 2. Paul 3. Gravel Hmm, I'm sensing a pattern developing. I knew you guys were a bunch of libertarians.... Well except for nastyboy, but that's not surprising...this time of year his mind is on the donkey and the pineapple more than anything.<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('128755','Mike'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('128755','Mike','1. Kucinich\r\n2. Paul\r\n3. Gravel\r\n\r\nHmm, I\'m sensing a pattern developing. I knew you guys were a bunch of libertarians....\r\n\r\nWell except for nastyboy, but that\'s not surprising...this time of year his mind is on the donkey and the pineapple more than anything.'); return false;">Quote</a></div> 1. Kucinich
2. Paul
3. Gravel

Hmm, I’m sensing a pattern developing. I knew you guys were a bunch of libertarians….

Well except for nastyboy, but that’s not surprising…this time of year his mind is on the donkey and the pineapple more than anything.

Reply – Quote
]]> By: Treehugger http://www.stageleft.info/2007/12/20/in-case-you-needed-further-proof/comment-page-1/#comment-128753 Treehugger Fri, 21 Dec 2007 15:21:13 +0000 http://www.stageleft.info/2007/12/20/in-case-you-needed-further-proof/#comment-128753 1. Kucinich 2. Gravel 3. Biden<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('128753','Treehugger'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('128753','Treehugger','1. Kucinich\r\n2. Gravel\r\n3. Biden'); return false;">Quote</a></div> 1. Kucinich
2. Gravel
3. Biden
Reply – Quote
]]> By: JimBobby http://www.stageleft.info/2007/12/20/in-case-you-needed-further-proof/comment-page-1/#comment-128752 JimBobby Fri, 21 Dec 2007 13:48:22 +0000 http://www.stageleft.info/2007/12/20/in-case-you-needed-further-proof/#comment-128752 Whooee! 1. Kucinich 2. Gravel 3. Paul Since I hold duel citizenship, I'll actually vote in the 2008 US election. I'm pretty sure I won't get a chance to vote for any of my top three, though. JB<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('128752','JimBobby'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('128752','JimBobby','Whooee!\r\n\r\n1. Kucinich \r\n2. Gravel\r\n3. Paul\r\n\r\nSince I hold duel citizenship, I\'ll actually vote in the 2008 US election. I\'m pretty sure I won\'t get a chance to vote for any of my top three, though. \r\n\r\nJB'); return false;">Quote</a></div> Whooee!

1. Kucinich
2. Gravel
3. Paul

Since I hold duel citizenship, I’ll actually vote in the 2008 US election. I’m pretty sure I won’t get a chance to vote for any of my top three, though.

JB

Reply – Quote
]]> By: balbulican http://www.stageleft.info/2007/12/20/in-case-you-needed-further-proof/comment-page-1/#comment-128751 balbulican Fri, 21 Dec 2007 11:53:39 +0000 http://www.stageleft.info/2007/12/20/in-case-you-needed-further-proof/#comment-128751 I apparently match someone called Mike Gravel. Okay. With a name like that, I'll bet he rocks.<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('128751','balbulican'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('128751','balbulican','I apparently match someone called Mike Gravel. Okay. With a name like that, I\'ll bet he rocks.'); return false;">Quote</a></div> I apparently match someone called Mike Gravel. Okay. With a name like that, I’ll bet he rocks.
Reply – Quote
]]> By: nastyboy http://www.stageleft.info/2007/12/20/in-case-you-needed-further-proof/comment-page-1/#comment-128750 nastyboy Fri, 21 Dec 2007 09:10:31 +0000 http://www.stageleft.info/2007/12/20/in-case-you-needed-further-proof/#comment-128750 Well according to this poll on ABC.com I actuall match closest with Huckabee on issues but not by much. I only match 5 of the 11 questions. Hillary is 2nd and Chris Dodd is 3rd. (Both with 4 out of 11). It's kind of a neat quiz. I predict alot of Kucinichs on this site. http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Vote2008/page?id=3623346<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('128750','nastyboy'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('128750','nastyboy','Well according to this poll on ABC.com I actuall match closest with Huckabee on issues but not by much. I only match 5 of the 11 questions. Hillary is 2nd and Chris Dodd is 3rd. (Both with 4 out of 11).\r\n\r\nIt\'s kind of a neat quiz. I predict alot of Kucinichs on this site.\r\n\r\nhttp:\/\/abcnews.go.com\/Politics\/Vote2008\/page?id=3623346'); return false;">Quote</a></div> Well according to this poll on ABC.com I actuall match closest with Huckabee on issues but not by much. I only match 5 of the 11 questions. Hillary is 2nd and Chris Dodd is 3rd. (Both with 4 out of 11).

It’s kind of a neat quiz. I predict alot of Kucinichs on this site.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Vote2008/page?id=3623346

Reply – Quote
]]> By: nastyboy http://www.stageleft.info/2007/12/20/in-case-you-needed-further-proof/comment-page-1/#comment-128748 nastyboy Fri, 21 Dec 2007 04:12:10 +0000 http://www.stageleft.info/2007/12/20/in-case-you-needed-further-proof/#comment-128748 I’m biased as hell against fundamentalist nutbars, and it don’t matter whether they be western pastors, or people like bin Laden

Again I don’t see MH as a hard core fundy or Neo-con idealogue. Conservative of course. Christian of course. So what?

He actually got a lot of bills past while Arkansas govenor, working with a Democratic state senate. He’s proven himself a pragmatist. He doesn’t scare me.

Rudy (9/11) is the only Rep. with a (9/11) change of winning any blue states. That’s why I’m pulling for him. I could live with Obama. The rest of them can go shit in their hats.

9/11

Reply – Quote
]]> By: stageleft http://www.stageleft.info/2007/12/20/in-case-you-needed-further-proof/comment-page-1/#comment-128747 stageleft Fri, 21 Dec 2007 03:53:36 +0000 http://www.stageleft.info/2007/12/20/in-case-you-needed-further-proof/#comment-128747 Sorry nastyboy, as soon as they start muttering about shite like that we're building another holy war - do you <i>really</i> think that's such a good idea? As far as I am concerned we haven't evolved enough since the last one to even consider another round of slaughter in the name of this, that, or some other god. <blockquote>Attacking the man on his faith is just small-minded and demonstrates the attackers own prejudices.</blockquote> No and yes. I'm not attacking the man on his faith, I'm attacking his stupidity and the stupidity of those around him. Yes, it does show my prejudices, I'm biased as hell against fundamentalist nutbars, and it don't matter whether they be western pastors, or people like bin Laden, they're dangerous enough without weapons - and we've already seen what happens when ya give 'em armies.<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('128747','stageleft'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('128747','stageleft','Sorry nastyboy, as soon as they start muttering about shite like that we\'re building another holy war - do you <i>really<\/i> think that\'s such a good idea? As far as I am concerned we haven\'t evolved enough since the last one to even consider another round of slaughter in the name of this, that, or some other god.\r\n\r\n<blockquote>Attacking the man on his faith is just small-minded and demonstrates the attackers own prejudices.<\/blockquote>\r\n\r\nNo and yes. \r\n\r\nI\'m not attacking the man on his faith, I\'m attacking his stupidity and the stupidity of those around him.\r\n\r\nYes, it does show my prejudices, I\'m biased as hell against fundamentalist nutbars, and it don\'t matter whether they be western pastors, or people like bin Laden, they\'re dangerous enough without weapons - and we\'ve already seen what happens when ya give \'em armies.'); return false;">Quote</a></div> Sorry nastyboy, as soon as they start muttering about shite like that we’re building another holy war – do you really think that’s such a good idea? As far as I am concerned we haven’t evolved enough since the last one to even consider another round of slaughter in the name of this, that, or some other god.

Attacking the man on his faith is just small-minded and demonstrates the attackers own prejudices.

No and yes.

I’m not attacking the man on his faith, I’m attacking his stupidity and the stupidity of those around him.

Yes, it does show my prejudices, I’m biased as hell against fundamentalist nutbars, and it don’t matter whether they be western pastors, or people like bin Laden, they’re dangerous enough without weapons – and we’ve already seen what happens when ya give ‘em armies.

Reply – Quote
]]> By: nastyboy http://www.stageleft.info/2007/12/20/in-case-you-needed-further-proof/comment-page-1/#comment-128745 nastyboy Fri, 21 Dec 2007 03:14:18 +0000 http://www.stageleft.info/2007/12/20/in-case-you-needed-further-proof/#comment-128745 Hillary, Obama, and Edwards (and, frankly, any of the Democratic candidates) would wipe the floor with Huckabee in any debate.

You obviously haven’t seen Huckabee debate. He can be very charasmatic and quick on his feet. Why do you think he’s been catching up to Rudy?

“a guy with the training of a pastor understands the theological nature of the war“.

Ah…. yeah, just what the world needs, another world leader with nukes and a big army who hears the voice of a higher father.

Fail.

All that tells me is his campaign dude thinks that his theological training may help him understand the mind and motivations of the enemy. Whether or not that’s true is another matter. Noting about Huckabee makes me feel he’s the type that’s going to go nuke muslim commie for Jesus.

If your going to crap on the guy attack his record and his position on the issues, there’s plenty to work with there.

Attacking the man on his faith is just small-minded and demonstrates the attackers own prejudices.

And for the record I don’t want MH to win. I’m all about Rudy.

9/11

Reply – Quote
]]> By: Throbbin http://www.stageleft.info/2007/12/20/in-case-you-needed-further-proof/comment-page-1/#comment-128743 Throbbin Thu, 20 Dec 2007 21:16:38 +0000 http://www.stageleft.info/2007/12/20/in-case-you-needed-further-proof/#comment-128743 I personally hope Huckabee wins the Republican nomination. Hillary, Obama, and Edwards (and, frankly, any of the Democratic candidates) would wipe the floor with Huckabee in any debate.<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('128743','Throbbin'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('128743','Throbbin','I personally hope Huckabee wins the Republican nomination.\r\n\r\nHillary, Obama, and Edwards (and, frankly, any of the Democratic candidates) would wipe the floor with Huckabee in any debate.'); return false;">Quote</a></div> I personally hope Huckabee wins the Republican nomination.

Hillary, Obama, and Edwards (and, frankly, any of the Democratic candidates) would wipe the floor with Huckabee in any debate.

Reply – Quote
]]>