What Is It About The Stallz?

It appears that Larry “I’m not gay” Craig, the good Republican Senator from Idaho, is in more hot water over his bathroom (and other) antics.

Four gay men, willing to put their names in print and whose allegations can’t be disproved, have come forward since news of U.S. Sen. Larry Craig’s guilty plea. They say they had sex with Craig or that he made a sexual advance or that he paid them unusual attention

[.....]

A fifth gay man, who is from Boise but who declined to be named for fear of retaliation, offered a recent and telling account: He was in a men’s restroom at Denver International Airport in September 2006 when the man in the next stall moved his hand slowly, palm up, under the divider. Alarmed, the man said he waited outside the restroom and then identified the man in the adjoining stall as Craig, whom he had met in Idaho.

I wonder if Mr Family Values he’ll continue to stick around after this, or if he’ll continue to play the oh woe is me, I am a victim of a heinous plot to discredit all my good work?

 

Trackposted to Mark My Words, third world county, DragonLady’s World, Pirate’s Cove, The Pink Flamingo, The Bullwinkle Blog, Right Voices, and Adeline and Hazel, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

This entry was posted by stageleft on Monday, December 3rd, 2007 and is filed under US Politics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

One Response to “What Is It About The Stallz?”

  1. David on December 4th, 2007 at 12:49 pm

    I’ve seen no evidence to this point that Larry Craig is gay. I have seen him appear to be angry, abashed, embarrassed, pseudo-apologetic and other emotive affectations easily employed by the Chief Lying Class (politicians *spit*), but I have never seen him appear to be happy and carefree (i.e., gay).

    As to his alleged homosexual behavior, I have little doubt that the weight of the evidence is in, and Larry Craig is indeed a homosexual/bisexual/ambisexual deviant, or some mix thereof. But “gay”? Not shown to be so to date.

    *heh*

Causes & Sponsors

Recent Comments

  • stageleft: Rebuke? Have you not read some of the commentary? It comes far closer to frothing at the mouth than rebuke.
  • stageleft: @Dr.Dawg: Sorry Dawg, generally when making comparrisions of this nature you have to compare like to like...
  • Raphael: Oh, I’m sure reading that conversation will only confirm whatever prearrangement of thoughts people...
  • Raphael: @balbulican - This was Dawg’s argument as well, and I think it’s a distraction from the main...
  • balbulican: I provided a link to the discussion in question, Raphael ( a courtesy not often afforded me by the folks...
  • Raphael: @balbulican - You oversimplify my viewpoints, but I agree the Oxford debate was regrettable. I haven’t...
  • Raphael: @LuLu - Get your facts straight. The discussion that time wasn’t about an encroaching “brown...
  • Throbbin: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =G-lMOxuciYQ
  • stageleft: @Throbbin: hehe
  • Throbbin: Fuck Saskatchewan!

Disclaimer: The writings, musing, comments, thoughts, and ideas, put forward within the stageleft.info domain belong solely to their individual authors who hold ultimate responsibility for them. While here be mindful of the words of Buddha: Believe nothing just because a so-called wise person said it. Believe nothing just because a belief is generally held. Believe nothing just because it is said in ancient books. Believe nothing just because it is said to be of divine origin. Believe nothing just because someone else believes it. Believe only what you yourself test and judge to be true.

Designed by Gabfire slightly modified by stageleft