Is He Stupid, Or Lying - You Decide

– or maybe he’s just a typical politician who thinks the rest of us are stupid.

Aside from the invasion of Iraq, and the last US presidential election, I can think of no other issue in recent memory that divided the American people more than the Schiavo case, and I find it really difficult to believe that an American lawyer and former law maker doesn’t remember what happened.

Republican presidential candidate Fred Thompson gave no opinion Thursday when asked about efforts by President Bush and Congress to keep Terri Schiavo alive, saying he does not remember details of the right-to-die case that stirred national debate.

[.....]

“I can’t pass judgment on it. I know that good people were doing what they thought was best,” Thompson said. “That’s going back in history. I don’t remember the details of it.”

This entry was posted by stageleft on Saturday, September 15th, 2007 and is filed under US Politics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

7 Responses to “Is He Stupid, Or Lying - You Decide”

  1. Vinny on September 15th, 2007 at 10:15 am

    See, now this is why you keep me around.

    No only did he “not know the facts of the case” at the time he was asked, but Ryan Sager from the New York Sun got in contact with him the next day and asked about it. His spokesman said:

    “While he believes in the sanctity of life, he also believes that it was a decision for the family to make under state law, so there was no role for the federal government to play.”

    A: That’s a remarkable turnabout in 13 hours (from not having an opinion to exploring the issue so deeply that it’s a federalism issue).

    B: He gave the standard “federalism” answer just like he did on gay marriage which basically means he doesn’t have to take a stance on it because it’s a “state issue.”

    This guy oughta have one hell of a campaign. Every issue is not his problem.

  2. Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator on September 15th, 2007 at 10:33 am

    Obama: Democrats don’t have Iraq votes

    Despite the Iraq war’s unpopularity, Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama said Thursday th

  3. Arwen on September 15th, 2007 at 3:32 pm

    Do we need to decide? Can’t people be stupid and lie, both?

  4. Arwen on September 15th, 2007 at 3:35 pm

    ((oh, although I check box c) specifically here - he’s a coward. really, any way you slice it: whether he’s abandoning a principle, only adopted it for politics, or thinks he made a mistake. it may be the case that politics makes people cowardly because honesty is not rewarded. ))

  5. balbulican on September 16th, 2007 at 6:01 am

    He’s the kind of “aw shucks, just a common sense kinda feller” candidate who attracts the booboisie in the for the first stretch of a campaign and fades quickly. You may take this is as a prediction.

    (Hey, V, welcome back!)

  6. Candace on September 17th, 2007 at 7:00 pm

    “Aside from the invasion of Iraq, and the last US presidential election, I can think of no other issue in recent memory that divided the American people more than the Schiavo case”

    I call B$.

    Katrina - way bigger issue (and continues to be)
    GWB all the time, regardless - way bigger issue
    The Goreacle & global warming & creating companies to buy carbon credits from - way bigger issue

    Schiavo was a very large issue to those who are passionate about right-to-life/pro-life issues and those on the opposite side of the argument. I would argue that the other 80-90% of the general public made a quick judgement call on the case, based on their own beliefs, and pretty much ignored it, and don’t remember the details, either.

  7. balbulican on September 17th, 2007 at 7:18 pm

    I gotta agree with Candace on this one, and “Hurricane Katrina” isn’t a bad metaphor; extremely intense impact in limited circles, mild interest elsewhere that faded rapidly after the event.

    For those involved in the argument, it was ferocious - I saw some good friendships go up in smoke during the Schiavo debate. But for the rest of us - the vast majority of Sancho Panzas, as opposed to the Don Quixotes - it didn’t matter very much.

Causes & Sponsors

Recent Comments

  • Greg H.: Great work on hosting that document!
  • L-girl: Thanks for posting this. Great that you picked up the pdf too. In the next day or so, I’m going to run...
  • BJ: The private sector should be under no compulsion to provide their services to anyone I don’t know SL, try...
  • stageleft: Rebuke? Have you not read some of the commentary? It comes far closer to frothing at the mouth than rebuke.
  • stageleft: @Dr.Dawg: Sorry Dawg, generally when making comparrisions of this nature you have to compare like to like...
  • Raphael: Oh, I’m sure reading that conversation will only confirm whatever prearrangement of thoughts people...
  • Raphael: @balbulican - This was Dawg’s argument as well, and I think it’s a distraction from the main...
  • balbulican: I provided a link to the discussion in question, Raphael ( a courtesy not often afforded me by the folks...
  • Raphael: @balbulican - You oversimplify my viewpoints, but I agree the Oxford debate was regrettable. I haven’t...
  • Raphael: @LuLu - Get your facts straight. The discussion that time wasn’t about an encroaching “brown...

Disclaimer: The writings, musing, comments, thoughts, and ideas, put forward within the stageleft.info domain belong solely to their individual authors who hold ultimate responsibility for them. While here be mindful of the words of Buddha: Believe nothing just because a so-called wise person said it. Believe nothing just because a belief is generally held. Believe nothing just because it is said in ancient books. Believe nothing just because it is said to be of divine origin. Believe nothing just because someone else believes it. Believe only what you yourself test and judge to be true.

Designed by Gabfire slightly modified by stageleft