Maybe They Have No Line In The Sand

When you read about countries that are known to torture their prisoners, actively discourage dissent, and spy on their citizens, you have to wonder if there is any line in the sand that will result in the citizenry saying, “enough, no more, this is where it stops” - America apparently isn’t there yet.

Civil libertarians object say DOC rules are censorship

CRANSTON, R.I. (AP) — Civil libertarians say proposed changes at the Department of Corrections to limit inmate interviews with the media amount to censorship.

They plan to air their concerns at a public hearing tomorrow.

Among the changes: officials could deny interview requests if they feel it’s not sensitive to crime victims.

They would bar interviews without of state inmates. They would also require a corrections official to be present when interviews are conducted.

(emphasis mine)

I wonder what it will take?

h/t Flying Hamster

—–

Trackposted to Perri Nelson’s Website, Blog @ MoreWhat.com, DeMediacratic Nation, Big Dog’s Weblog, DragonLady’s World, Webloggin, Leaning Straight Up, The Bullwinkle Blog, Conservative Cat, third world county, Pirate’s Cove, CommonSenseAmerica, Republican National Convention Blog, CORSARI D’ITALIA, and High Desert Wanderer, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

This entry was posted by stageleft on Monday, September 10th, 2007 and is filed under Authoritarianism, US Politics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

One Response to “Maybe They Have No Line In The Sand”

  1. Blog @ MoreWhat.com » Blog Archive » MoreWhat Matters: Today’s Blog List on September 11th, 2007 at 6:33 pm

    [...] Stageleft:. Life on the [lower] left side » Blog Archive » Maybe They Have No Line In The Sand [...]

Causes & Sponsors

Recent Comments

  • Greg H.: Great work on hosting that document!
  • L-girl: Thanks for posting this. Great that you picked up the pdf too. In the next day or so, I’m going to run...
  • BJ: The private sector should be under no compulsion to provide their services to anyone I don’t know SL, try...
  • stageleft: Rebuke? Have you not read some of the commentary? It comes far closer to frothing at the mouth than rebuke.
  • stageleft: @Dr.Dawg: Sorry Dawg, generally when making comparrisions of this nature you have to compare like to like...
  • Raphael: Oh, I’m sure reading that conversation will only confirm whatever prearrangement of thoughts people...
  • Raphael: @balbulican - This was Dawg’s argument as well, and I think it’s a distraction from the main...
  • balbulican: I provided a link to the discussion in question, Raphael ( a courtesy not often afforded me by the folks...
  • Raphael: @balbulican - You oversimplify my viewpoints, but I agree the Oxford debate was regrettable. I haven’t...
  • Raphael: @LuLu - Get your facts straight. The discussion that time wasn’t about an encroaching “brown...

Disclaimer: The writings, musing, comments, thoughts, and ideas, put forward within the stageleft.info domain belong solely to their individual authors who hold ultimate responsibility for them. While here be mindful of the words of Buddha: Believe nothing just because a so-called wise person said it. Believe nothing just because a belief is generally held. Believe nothing just because it is said in ancient books. Believe nothing just because it is said to be of divine origin. Believe nothing just because someone else believes it. Believe only what you yourself test and judge to be true.

Designed by Gabfire slightly modified by stageleft