Our Sincere Apologies

No posts since yesterday, and not even a quick note about why. Hopefully you’ll agree that what we were doing was worthwhile, we were off in the UpperRightQuadrant getting educated as to why governments should not be not financially responsible for their actions or negligence – it was a truly enlightening process.

It appears that we’re not very good learners though, try as they might the UpperRightQuadrant was unable to clearly explain to us the difference between an institution like the LA archdiocese reaching a settlement over sexual abuse being (possibly – there’s one question still outstanding, we might have misunderstood that as well) reasonable, possibly even ok, but an institution like a government doing the same is not.

Go look, it’s a long and winding tale that includes phrases like “reinforce victimhood” and “a waste of money”, such diverse locations as Iraq (yes, they brought Sadam into the discussion) and Rwanda, a fictional murder with an orphan, and at least one reference to a tribe of head hunting pygmy’s in South America.

PS: If ya figure it out before Shane answers my question do drop is a note in the comments section will ya.

This entry was posted by stageleft on Tuesday, July 17th, 2007 and is filed under Aboriginal Issues, Canada, Canadian Politics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Recommend this Post @ Progressive Bloggers

10 Responses to “Our Sincere Apologies”

  1. ThePolitic.com » I left my heart in San Diego on July 17th, 2007 at 7:00 pm

    [...] Over at Stageleft, they ask a provocative question:  It appears that we’re not very good learners though, try as they might the UpperRightQuadrant was unable to clearly explain to us the difference between an institution like the LA archdiocese reaching a settlement over sexual abuse being (possibly – there’s one question still outstanding, we might have misunderstood that as well) reasonable, possibly even ok, but an institution like a government doing the same is not. [...]

  2. Shane on July 17th, 2007 at 7:22 pm

    Answer’s up. Enjoy.

  3. balbulican on July 17th, 2007 at 8:29 pm

    Ahem. Well…”sort of answer”’s up.

  4. stageleft on July 17th, 2007 at 9:08 pm

    Sorry man, as I said over there, that’s not an answer.

    But don’t trouble yourself about it, I read enough of your comments to get the drift of how you think.

  5. balbulican on July 18th, 2007 at 6:32 am

    It was fun, sort of. But I think I’m finished with Politic as a reader. We delinked them last week because their best writers have been silent for weeks, and the quality of both posting and commentary was sinking.

    Over the last couple of days their thread on Aboriginal issues has been a depressing reminder that URQs like that (a) don’t know what they’re talking about, beyond the racist crap of Tom Flanagan,(b) have no interest in learning, and (c) see Aboriginal affairs chiefly as a an easy way to start an argument when they can’t think of anything else to bitch about.

    Talking to the wilfully ignorant can be fun for a bit, sort of like a cat feels when digging into a scratching post. But I’m afraid the Politic has exhausted its entertainment value for me. Tom, Greg – I always enjoyed your writing and our discussions. It’s a shame you let the Axis of Stupid convert your once interesting site into a litter box.

  6. Treehugger on July 18th, 2007 at 8:39 am

    Geeze….I just read the thread at the politic and it reminds me distinctly why I don’t bother getting into debates with narrow minded bloggers who are little more than demagogues.

    I think I will continue to just hang out here once in while for the time being.

  7. balbulican on July 18th, 2007 at 8:55 am

    You learned faster than I did, TH.

  8. stageleft on July 18th, 2007 at 1:47 pm

    Willfully ignorant? You’re being too kind by far. ThePolitic has more than one racist blogger on their list of authors – as frustrating as it is the only reason for engaging bigotry of that nature is to help spread it to as wide an audience as possible.

  9. JimBobby on July 18th, 2007 at 4:41 pm

    Whooee! Dang an’ double-dang, SL. I been stayin’ away from that cesspool fer over a year an’ now I fell off the wagon an’ went back on accounta yer link. I knew it was gonna put my blood pressure in the danger zone but I went anyways.

    An’ what do I find besides the ignorant bigots I knew I’d find? Some dumbass tryin’ to copy my schtick.

    I’m chewin’ nails an’ fartin’ tacks!

    JB

  10. ThePolitic.com » Government Reparations and Limited Responsibility on July 19th, 2007 at 1:50 pm

    [...] Without meaning to, I started a bit of a firestorm a couple of days ago over the residential schools issue. This has caused me to look much more seriously at this issue than I had before. While those who disagreed with me called attention to some remarks of mine that were perhaps not as well thought out as they could have been, I have had a chance to focus my thoughts on what for me is the most important objection to the Canadian government paying reparations to the victims of those crimes incurred as a result of that program. [...]

Causes & Sponsors

Recent Comments

  • ck: Oh my! Why am I not surprised?
  • stageleft: Apparently free thinkers are bad as well [ source ]
  • Skinny Dipper: I read the Communist Manifesto in my first year Political Science course at the University of Western...
  • Ti-Guy: I’m skeptical that it is as bad as ‘Metro’ made it sound, although it sounds pretty bad. It’s...
  • Dr.Dawg: I know, cheap shot, but shouldn’t that be “Thinner Mike Duffy?”
  • Looney Canuck: Someone pointed it out to me this morning on the bus. I’m skeptical that it is as bad as...
  • Throbbin: I don’t like critical thinking. Gums up the brain.
  • Ti-Guy: “Kim Kierans, head of the King’s School of Journalism, was surprised to hear Duffy’s comments. She...
  • Mike Brock: I’m skeptical that carbon taxes within ranges we’d generally consider marginal would do much,...
  • Throbbin: What’s a Carbon Tax if it’s not a marginal tax-increase? It wouldn’t require “major...

Recent Trackbacks


Disclaimer: The writings, musing, comments, thoughts, and ideas, put forward within the stageleft.info domain belong solely to their individual authors who hold ultimate responsibility for them. While here be mindful of the words of Buddha: Believe nothing just because a so-called wise person said it. Believe nothing just because a belief is generally held. Believe nothing just because it is said in ancient books. Believe nothing just because it is said to be of divine origin. Believe nothing just because someone else believes it. Believe only what you yourself test and judge to be true.

Designed by Gabfire slightly modified by stageleft