The Greater Meaning Of The Stanley Cup

Equipped with the lexicon of hockey platitudes generously provided by yourselves, I ventured last night down to Elgin St. and took in The Game in the company of friends. And I must say, I think I was reasonably convincing, relying on a combination of mock-rapt attention to the screen, cheering and booing a quarter second after everyone else did, and periodically deploying predigested pellets of hockey wisdom, (e.g., a Zen-like “It’s Anybody’s Game”.) All in all, I think in all modesty I gave a pretty good impression of someone who (a) understood what was going on, and (b) gave a shit.

What was really interesting, however, was the discussion during the breaks, where I learned from the folks in the bar that this was all about much more than hockey. This series is, it seems, an apocalyptic showdown between Canada and the United States, a symbolic struggle fraught with Manichean overtones, a gladiatorial contest in which the favour of the hockey gods provides us with a sign of heaven’s will. With each successive beer, paradoxically, the cosmic importance of the battle got clearer, while the specifics of the issues actually being adjudicated by the gods through this medium got fuzzier.

So again, I turn to you, my hockey mentors, for help. If the Ottawa Senators (and by extension, Canada) win the Stanley Cup, is this a sign that:

a) The Canadian Health Care system is superior;
b) We were right not to send troops to Iraq;
c) We shouldn’t elect judges;
d) The hockey gods want us to meet our Kyoto targets
e) All of the above
f) Other: _______________________________________

Looking forward to your clarification. Please get back to me before the next game.

This entry was posted by balbulican on Tuesday, May 29th, 2007 and is filed under General. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Recommend this Post @ Progressive Bloggers

8 Responses to “The Greater Meaning Of The Stanley Cup”

  1. JonZor on May 29th, 2007 at 9:53 am

    f) Other: Lord Stanley will rise from the grave, and walk amongst us, bringing salvation to the believers (Ottawa fans) and healing the sick (Toronto fans). The holy host of angels will sing (Hockey night in Canada theme) and all across the land, there will be rejoicing.

  2. dissendat on May 29th, 2007 at 9:53 am

    There are many other permutations and possibilities in this frail universe, my friend. Ipso fatso, sin-quote-nine, that Canada’s Harper is better than Dubya? That imperial gallons are cheaper than U.S. gallons? That metric rules?? OMG, that you might actually be able to use an Amurrican quarter instead of moose money in snack machines???

    I feel a rift in the force.

  3. Lord Kitchener's Own on May 29th, 2007 at 10:06 am

    I think the bigger question is whether Ottawa is an extension of Canada in this scenario?

    I do feel some need to (VERY reluctantly this year) cheer for the team based in Canada, which is my usual tendancy once my team is eliminated, but I know a LOT of Canadians don’t feel the same way (especially, though by no means exclusively, Leafs fans) and even I’m pretty indifferent, despite my usual patriotic bandwagon hopping.

    Plenty of people will point out that there are more Canadians on the Ducks than there are on the Sens, and the main reason they know that is because people went actively searching for excuses not to cheer for Ottawa in the finals. I don’t think it’s the same as when Edmonton and Calgary were recently in the finals. Here in Southern Ontario at least, people were on that bandwagon pretty quick, rallying behind the “Canadian” side. When the Sens make the final, people outside of Ottawa (in Southern Ontario anyway) actively pursue justifications to NOT cheer for the “Canadian” side (mostly, by arguing it’s not REALLY the “Canadian” side). I imagine there might have been similar feeling in Edmonton when the Flames were in, and in Calgary when the Oilers were in, but I think it’s different for Ottawa. I know there are Flames and Oilers fans outside of Alberta. I think you’d be hard pressed to find a Sens fan outside of Ottawa (frankly, you’re hard-pressed to find a Sens fan INSIDE of Ottawa, as they’re outnumbered by Leafs fans).

    Anyway, before we invest the series with international implications, it’s best we all agree which team is the “Canadian” one. In the GTA, I think you’re just as likely to hear “Anaheim” as “Ottawa” in response to that question. Personally, I’d like to see a banner raised North of the border, and for a group of Canadian FANS to get a Cup for their team, so I can’t bring myself to cheer for a team that will raise it’s banner in California before an American crowd. It drives me nuts though. The only teams I dislike more are all South of the Mason Dixon, and that’s more philosophical than passionate. Ottawa is exactly the kind of team that drives one to counting how many Canadians play for the team from Southern California. And now I have to root for them to win the Cup. Unlike many, I just can’t rationalize my way out of it.

    Damn Senators.

  4. Treehugger on May 29th, 2007 at 10:45 am

    JonZor is on to something.

    It means that Lord Stanley and all the hockey greats of posterity will not allow their cup to be engraved with the preposterous Hollywood (Americanized) name “Mighty Ducks”.

  5. Arwen on May 29th, 2007 at 3:14 pm

    Maple syrup vs. Pancake syrup. You’d think it would be obvious. But we’re waiting for god to weigh in, and god is known to appreciate strange sects and corn syrup products both. Go fig’.

  6. Mentarch on May 29th, 2007 at 4:44 pm

    f) Other … it is a sign that we are “living” in The Matrix!

    (sorry – couldn’t resist) ;-)

  7. Lord Kitchener's Own on May 29th, 2007 at 6:41 pm

    Actually, in all seriousness, I don’t think most people necessarily think of this all as being about “beating the Americans” so much as it’s about a Canadian team winning the Stanley Cup. LORD Stanley’s Cup. The Governor General’s Cup. If you see where I’m going.

    It’s not about demonstrating our superiority to Americans or anything. After all, Teemu Selanne wasn’t born in Michigan. And neither was Chris Pronger. But for me, the thing is, it’s OUR Cup, and I’d just as soon that one of our teams holds it as any other. Sure the teams are all professional now, and the players from all over (though still, mostly Canadian). I’d still rather see them raise a Stanley Cup Banner and have a parade in Ottawa than in Anaheim. And as contradictory as it is, to tell the truth I’m not at all happy that that’s the way it is. But that’s still the way it is.

    Dammit. (mumble mumble).

    :-)

  8. pete on June 1st, 2007 at 6:43 pm

    I think it’s a pretty horrible thing to say that it’s hard to find sens fans in Ottawa.. You must have your eyes binded shut and your ears plugged by Leaf’s propaganda LKO :)

Causes & Sponsors

Recent Comments

  • Skinny Dipper: I read the Communist Manifesto in my first year Political Science course at the University of Western...
  • Ti-Guy: I’m skeptical that it is as bad as ‘Metro’ made it sound, although it sounds pretty bad. It’s...
  • Dr.Dawg: I know, cheap shot, but shouldn’t that be “Thinner Mike Duffy?”
  • Looney Canuck: Someone pointed it out to me this morning on the bus. I’m skeptical that it is as bad as...
  • Throbbin: I don’t like critical thinking. Gums up the brain.
  • Ti-Guy: “Kim Kierans, head of the King’s School of Journalism, was surprised to hear Duffy’s comments. She...
  • Mike Brock: I’m skeptical that carbon taxes within ranges we’d generally consider marginal would do much,...
  • Throbbin: What’s a Carbon Tax if it’s not a marginal tax-increase? It wouldn’t require “major...
  • Mike Brock: And by “outlawed”, I meant “outlined”. I mean, I’d put moving to carbon...
  • Mike Brock: At the end of the day, unpopular measures will still meet public scrutiny. Marginal tax increases are one...

Recent Trackbacks


Disclaimer: The writings, musing, comments, thoughts, and ideas, put forward within the stageleft.info domain belong solely to their individual authors who hold ultimate responsibility for them. While here be mindful of the words of Buddha: Believe nothing just because a so-called wise person said it. Believe nothing just because a belief is generally held. Believe nothing just because it is said in ancient books. Believe nothing just because it is said to be of divine origin. Believe nothing just because someone else believes it. Believe only what you yourself test and judge to be true.

Designed by Gabfire slightly modified by stageleft