Many of the shrinking list of climate change detractors cling to the argument that it is foolhardy to endorse the notion that man is having an impact on climate change citing the fact that much of the science on the topic so far is based on computer models.  Those programs, they argue, are based on a limited understanding of the atmosphere and how each of the parts tie together.  According to this article they may be right.  Unfotunately, the validity of that line of thought has another logical progression that might just not support their worldview.  I feel for them.  I really do.