As I’ve said before, the more authoritarian your politics the greater the likelihood that you’re a bigot.
Comments For This Post Topic Was Disable By Author
A ‘free pass’ means “The BC Court of Appeal reduced the sentence from 9 years to 7,”?
What an idiot…
I find it interesting how charges of bigotry are thrown around to protect the special status of a particular racial group in the politics of group rights. I thought that we fought for years to judge people on the content of their character as opposed to the colour of their skin. Silly me, I guess that the BC Court of Appeal hadn’t heard of Dr. King.
Sorry SL, the only racism here is on the part of the BCCA. Better luck next time.
You find conservativism and classical liberalism “authoritarian”? Odd. Try disengaging yourself and your property from the statist flavours of political organization in Canada and see where real “authoritarianism” lies.
Oh, and the “bigot” would be the person arguing that a person deserves a harsher sentence because the person is an “X”. Someone arguing that the characteristic of distinction should be irrelevant is not a bigot.
From the article: “The B.C. Court of Appeal ruled the judge at Darnell Pratt’s trial didn’t properly take into account his young age and his aboriginal background.”
It’s the law that’s racist in this case, SL.
Pratt originally pleaded guilty and was sentenced as an adult (so the Appeals Court judge really has no basis for citing his youth). He had spent about 14 months in jail waiting for trial, so his original sentence of 9 years for the deliberate killing of Grant DePatie was automatically reduced by 28 months, leaving him to serve 6 years and 8 months. That would make him eligible for parole in two years and three months from the time of sentencing.
With the reduction of time by two years, though, Pratt can now be out of jail almost before he gets there. Why? Because he’s “aboriginal” or “first nations” or whatever you want to call it.
And what, exactly, did he do to win this get-out-of-jail-early card? From another article almost a year ago:
“On March 7 last year, Pratt drank about 20 beers while hanging out and breaking into cars with friends. That night, he stole a Chrysler LeBaron and tried to flee an Esso station without paying for $12.30 in gas. Esso worker Grant De Patie tried to stop him, and the unlicensed car thief ran him over.
“Mr. Pratt was aware that he had struck someone, but continued to accelerate away,” Bernard told a New Westminster court.
Pratt later told a friend he’d heard screaming under the car, but it was never made clear in court when that screaming would have occurred. The car was seen blasting through a stop sign, and at one point swerving inexplicably, Bernard noted.
De Patie’s body, naked except for tattered clothes around his ankles, was found 7.5 kilometres from the Esso at the end of a trail of blood. His flesh had been ground away to the bone on his face, ribs, right leg and chest, his liver was torn, and his pelvis broken.
“Mr. De Patie did not die from being struck by a car, but rather from injuries he sustained while being dragged alive under the vehicle,” Bernard said, drawing sobs from De Patie’s mom.
After hitting De Patie and driving around Maple Ridge, Pratt went to a friend’s and told people he’d killed someone. Then he and others drove in a stolen truck to Hope and back.”
Visualize that. Better still, come out to Maple Ridge and walk the five miles where Grant was literally ground into the roadway. Listen for the screams as his body is being filed into slivers, caught between the undercarriage of a stolen car being piloted by a drunk driver who knew he was there, and the pavement.
Mike: There are no subleties in this case. It was a brutal, bloody, and deliberate murder.
I think you’re missing my point here RJ, IRC, and Chimera. Aaron said, quite publicly, that if you are an “indian” you can kill someone and get a “free pass”.
Is that what happened.
That’s a really simple question that requires a simple yes or no answer.
Agreement or disagreement with sentencing and/or sentencing conditions (and trust me I have my own very personal opinions on both) have nothing to do with answering that question.
IRC: Our government is not authoritarian enough to be totalitarian, but it is authoritarian enough to want to regulate things it has no business regulating. The Blogging Tories, of which ThePolitic is a part, supports that government, I think the connection is both clear and valid.
Try looking at where the great racists of our times, and times past, sit on the authoritarian/libertarian slide and tell me that I am still wrong.
– then again, maybe you’re right, what’s your defination of (small c) conservatism? Feel free to pick any of the branches, I think the majority of folks are at least passingly familiar with cultural, fiscal, and/or religious, conservatism so relating any of those ideals, or any other type of conservatism for that matter, to Aarons statement that Indians can kill people and get a free ride would be a good start.
“Is that what happened.”
Essentially, yes, that is precisely what happened. That’s what the judge from the Appeals Court said.
“Essentially, yes, that is precisely what happened. That’s what the judge from the Appeals Court said.”
A seven year sentence is a “free pass”?
Don’t be silly.
I guess I gotta read more dictionaries. I completely missed the redefinition of “free pass”, I was labouring under the impression that it meant the same thing now as it did when I was a kid - you know, no penalty.
Whooee! I reckon there’s lotsa killers gettin’ a free pass - or at least the next thing to it. This guy who got his term reduced from 9 to 7 years might be one of ‘em. 9 years sounds sorta lenient t’ me when the crime is killin’ an innocent person while committin’ a robbery. I think we got too many non-violent people in jail an’ not enough violent ones.
Killers who wear military uniforms get free passes, even when they go against orders and drop bombs on their own allies. Killers who send suspects off to be tortured to death in hell holes like Syria an’ Pakistan an’ Burma an’ secret locations all over the world get free passes, too.
The system ain’t perfect an’ racial prejudice sure enough plays a role. Blonde-haired, blue-eyed killers like Karla Homulka who play to a preconception of innocent-white-middle-class-schoolgirl get the next thing to free passes, too.
JB
“A seven year sentence is a “free passâ€? Don’t be silly.”
Balb, that seven years is actually going to add up to a whole lot less than seven years. He will be able to apply for parole sometime this year. And, being “first nations” or whatever the current politically correct buzzword is, he will get parole! Out of jail, and essentially free to do anything he wants. And all because the law says that “we” have to make great big excuses for him because he’s racially impaired!
This would not happen if he weren’t Indian. If he were a white man, he’d be spending more time behind bars (not enough — not for the deliberate killing of a man, but more than he got). If that isn’t racist policy, I don’t know what is.
Dammit, I’m Indian, and this drives me frickin’ crazy! I get some people lookin’ at me like I’m gonna do something vile to their kids, and because I’m not a white man, I’m gonna get away with it! That somehow the law is gonna let me do whatever illegal or stupid thing I want…just because the law says that today’s citizens have to pay some kind of penance for the fact that my ancestors got turfed out of their homes so Lord Stanley could have his bloody park in the middle of the best piece of real estate in downtown Vancouver!
If we want to defeat racism in this country, we have to get rid of laws that make excuses based on someone’s race, religion, or family history. Kill someone, go to jail. Stay there. Period.
“Balb, that seven years is actually going to add up to a whole lot less than seven years. ”
As would the nine year sentence that it replaced. That’s not the issue.
‘If we want to defeat racism in this country, we have to get rid of laws that make excuses based on someone’s race, religion, or family history.”
See my comment in the other thread on this topic re the role of sentencing.


Aaron Unrah, I should have guessed. Nice of him to point out the context and subtleties of the case at hand. Oh wait, that would have gotten in the way of his racist screed. Never mind then.
What an ass.