Said in March 15th, 2007 @4:59 pm The majority of the Supreme Court felt the media blackout was needed to protect electoral fairness, and electoral democracy. The blackout provision, “by virtue of its objective of ensuring informational equality among voters, is a reasonable limit on” freedom on expression, the court explained.
And what do you think, Mr. Dickens?
“If the law supposes that,†said Mr. Bumble,“the law is a ass—a idiot.”
It's a sad state of affairs when Canadian kids are treated like this by the government - read about it here then contact your MP
1 year ago: 11/22/2007
2 years ago: 11/22/2006
There are 3 visitors currently online.
Powered by FireStats
When reading here you reminded of the words of Buddha: Believe nothing just because a so-called wise person said it. Believe nothing just because a belief is generally held. Believe nothing just because it is said in ancient books. Believe nothing just because it is said to be of divine origin. Believe nothing just because someone else believes it. Believe only what you yourself test and judge to be true.
The Forte theme by Moses Francis
Valid XHTML and Valid CSS
About the only thing “they” can do is block websites that they know about. But they can’t block e-mail.
If anyone in Newfoundland, and then travelling westward, wants to send me some “rumors” on election night, my e-mail address is on my blog profile. I can post “rumors” all night long…
Nobody in their right mind would try to regulate rumors. They’d be laughed out of the country.