|
Midnight. The Dirty Dozen. Twelve Angry Men. Cheaper By the Dozen. The Devil’s Dozen. Slice it any way you want, beloved adherents, Twelve is a potent number. And perhaps in synchronistic sympathy, the Blue Blogosphere, recognizing the importance of this edition, obligingly kicked in with peristaltic convulsions and sphinctered forth the following foetid five, a truly weird assortment to mark our twelfth sortie into the Blue Zone.
Remember it’s all in good fun. And don’t forget to vote for the post that best captures the essence of the rancid zeitgeist that is Contemporary Canadian Conservatism. Aperitif: Communion Wine “Angel Messenger” grimly warns the unwary new arrival that
Appetizer: Cul De Cochon Sauvage Yet another Joycean synthesis of sophisticated analysis and fecal imagery from your favorite meds-deprived Blue Tory, our own beloved Canadian Sentinel
“Big Poopy Bum”. Sigh. You could labour for years and never approach that for its succinct profundity. BTW, All fans of CS’s unique poots of performance art should note that he has been nominated under the category of Best Conservative Blog at the Canadian Blog Awards. In recognition of his utterly unique entertainment value (in addition, of course, to his journalistic and writing skills), I really think he deserves our support - seriously, is there anyone out there who better exemplifies the New Conservatism? Main course: Vodka, Borscht and Caviar There are those who accuse the Right of an almost psychotic obsession with a political system that has, for all intents and purposes, ceased to exit on the planet. Thank God (as long as She Doesn’t Look Too Arab) for the eternal vigilance of Blogging Tories like Officially Screwed, who finds Communism At Work In the Classroom, hiding in a box of pencils.
Damn Straight. First it’s Markers, then it’s MARX, I say! Dessert: White Chocolate Of all the “Hatred In The Name Of Christ” sites out there, Relapsed Catholic is the most canny. Its author (who probably doesn’t look the least bit Arab) seldom posts an actual opinion or quotable statement: she tends instead to rely on poison from others, like the vile ex insurance salesman who opines that “no one likes Arabs as customers …they don’t give a shit, because they have a notion of cultural superiority that makes so-called American ‘jingoism’ look like the weak, watered-down substance it is…these people are always spoiling for a fight”…and similar in-depth sociological wisdom, the kind you’d expect to hear around a particularly isolated Ozark cracker-barrel. Every once in a while, however, a glimmer of the loving Christian spirit that underlies her blog creeps through. As was the case, for example, when she took a speech by Desmond Tutu lamenting the damage done to black South Africans under Apartheid (note the correct spelling, Kate), carefully selected a couple of choice sentences out of context, and entitled her post: You realy have to read the Tutu story to appreciate just how dishonest a headline that was, with its vomitous implication that Bishop Tutu is somehow pining for the good old days when blacks in South Africa knew their place. The Wafer Thin Mint Kerplonka posits:
Well, Plonky, my man, ConUcopia has been compiling “an easy-to-access database of retarded comments/positions” from the right for twelve editions now. And it doesn’t seem to have stopped the flow. And with that we conclude the Conucopia Dirty Dozen. I’d like to thank our staff, Lily, Max, Stageleft, Treehugger, the Albanian Peoples’ Pehlivan Trotskyite midget oil wrestlers and research team, my Dad, and of course the loyal readership for whom we undertake these highly dangerous expeditions up the Congo of the Soul. And remember - The Bunker Sez…
DON’T FORGET TO VOTE FOR “CON OF THE WEEK!†|
Comments For This Post Topic Was Disable By Author
I’m sorry, but “Was Life Better Under a System which Killed, Disenfranchised, Tortured, Starved, and Destroyed” is just too precious not to vote for.
I can’t believe you didn’t include the lines before CS’s poopy comments:
Nazism was socialism, btw.
Leftism is, too, plus it’s also fascism. So is Islam. Islam was and is still also very close to Nazism. They worked together in WWII.
Leftism=Nazism=Islamofascism… ah, thinking folks will understand the relationships amongst all of these things. I’ve better things to do than spend my day trying to explain it all to closed-minded leftoideological fanatics.
I mean, how awesome is that? Islam is fascist! So are lefties. Everything I hate is fascism! Even puppies are fascists.
My dear fellow, the problem with CS’s little lunatic asylum is not finding material: it’s deciding what to leave out. This time I had to decide between this quote, a montage of images of men urinating (his newest obsession), or his comments on Belinda Stronach’s “gonads”. Someone better help him out with a little anatomy lesson before he meets his first actual girl, or he’s in for a John Ruskin style trauma.
The favorite Jesus gets my vote, if only because I get to post up this picture of Jesus recreated from a skull dated around the same period as Jesus using the latest in technology and anthropological evidence from the time.

Sorry folks, the pale skinned, blond wavy haired, blue eyed, Jesus just don’t fly.
That should in no way stop, or even discourage, folks from voting for their favorite representation of Jesus, as with many things religious, illusion and fantasy play major roles.
I’m going to have to vote for the Canadian Sentinel. I also think putting on a push to get the lttle turd awarded the “Best Conservative Blog” has a lot of merit. Be fun to trot out his private little hatefest as the best our Tory friends have to offer. It would also be fun to see their reaction if he wins.
…only because I get to post up this picture of Jesus
I don’t know, SL. Jesus doesn’t look too Arab in that one, but He does look a little too Jewish…
I’d love to see a database set up by the Cons to document the “retarded comments/positions” of the Left. It would be a laugh riot of hysterical dyspepsia and incoherent kvetching in its own right.
I don’t for one minute believe the Jesus described in the Bible actually existed, but that pic you posted, SL, is intriguing. I have some background in history and physical anthropology, and that seems to be quite a convincing reconstruction of a male Judean of that period. Could you let us know the source of the image? Thanks.
I penciled in a vote for the Main Course, BTW.


I am voting for the Main Course. Each of the courses is tempting, and fantastic in its own way. However, what really did it for me was Balb’s little addition - “First its markers, then its MARX”…..Aw hell I was laughing for a while when I read that.
Good edition!!